Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:18:32.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Priorities for Philanthropy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2012

Robert L. Bach
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The events of September 11 have forced institutions to reexamine their priorities and practices. Yet the first world war of the twenty-first century has left many wondering if there truly is a war, and what, if anything, different is demanded of them. The philanthropic sector in particular has not changed significantly, and it continues to struggle with fundamental concerns about its directions. If September 11 and its aftermath are to mean anything to philanthropy other than emergency relief, it must be a recognition that now is the time to tackle the problems and tensions that were ignored before the attacks. For nearly a year, philanthropy as a sector has not rallied behind this call for longer-term reform. Philanthropy should take up these tasks, no matter how daunting they may be, for if foundations do not lead the effort, it may be left to the governments and the militaries of the world to respond on their own.

Type
Articles
Information
Ethics & International Affairs , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , September 2002 , pp. 20 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lindblom, Lance E., “Common Vision–Common Goals?”(speech given at the Independent Sector Annual Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, November 4,2001)Google Scholar.

2 Soros, GeorgeThe Crisis of Global Capitalism 1998 New YorkPublic Affairsp.70Google Scholar.

3 Chen, Lincoln C. “Partnerships for Social Development in a Globalizing World” speech given at the Geneva 2000 Forum International Conference Centre, Geneva, July 27, 2000), p.3Google Scholar.

4 See, e.g., statements made by Theda Skocpol in Billitteri, Thomas J The American Prospect’:Civic Disengagement Chronicle of PhilanthropyJune 17, 1999Google Scholar.

5 International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty The Responsibility to Protect 2002 OttawaInternational Development Research CentreGoogle Scholar).