¹ Fukuyama, Francis, “The End of History?” The National Interest 16 (Summer 1989), pp. 719–32Google Scholar.

² Hoffmann, Stanley, “What Should We Do in the World?” The Atlantic Monthly 264 (October 1989), pp. 84–96Google Scholar.

³ For a survey, see Gaddis, John Lewis, “Toward the Post-Cold War World,” in Kegley, Charles W. Jr., and Wittkopf, Eugene R., eds., The Future of American Foreign Policy (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1992), pp. 16–32Google Scholar.

⁴ See Banks, Michael, “The International Relations Discipline: Asset or Liability for Conflict Resolution?” in Azar, Edward E. and Burton, John W., eds., International Conflict Resolution (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1986)Google Scholar, and Vasquez, John, The Power of Power Politics: A Critique (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1983Google Scholar).

⁵ Kennan, George F., American Diplomacy 1900–1950 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951), p. 42Google Scholar.

⁶ Morgenthau, Hans J., Politics Among Nations (New York: Knopf, 1958), p. 9Google Scholar.

⁷ Gordis, Robert, “Religion and International Responsibility,” in Thompson, Kenneth W., ed., Moral Dimensions of American Foreign Policy (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1984), p. 36Google Scholar.

⁸ Suganami, Hidemi, “A Normative Enquiry in International Relations,” Review of International Studies 9 (January 1983), p. 35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁹ Cohen, Marshall, “Moral Skepticism and International Relations,” in Kipuis, Kenneth and Meyers, Diana T., eds., Political Realism and International Morality (Boulder: Westview Press, 1987), pp. 15–16.Google Scholar This argument and distinction is elaborated in Kegley, Charles W. Jr., and Raymond, Gregory A., When Trust Breaks Down: Alliance Norms in World Politics (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1990).Google Scholar

¹⁰ Schlesinger, Arthur M. Jr., The Cycles of American History (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1986), p. 77Google Scholar.

¹¹ Newman, Charles, “What's Left Out of Literature,” New York Times Book Review (July 7, 1987), p. 25.Google Scholar

¹² Wright, Quincy, “The Outlawry of War and the Law of War,” American Journal of International Law 47 (July 1953), pp. 365–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹³ Mueller, John, “Deterrence, Nuclear Weapons, Morality, and War,” in Kegley, Charles W. Jr., and Schwab, Kenneth L., eds., After the Cold War: Questioning the Morality of Nuclear Deterrence (Boulder: Westview Press, 1991), p. 94Google Scholar.

¹⁴ Morgenthau, Hans J., The Purpose of American Politics (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1960), p. 8Google Scholar. This, arguably, is reflective of mainstream realism's position on morality in international affairs; for elaboration, see Rosenthal, Joel H., Righteous Realists (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

¹⁵ Butterfield, Herbert, The Statecraft of Machiavelli (New York: Collier, 1962), p. 8Google Scholar.

¹⁶ See Niebuhr, Reinhold, Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1932Google Scholar).

¹⁷ Higgins, Ronald, Plotting Peace (London: Brassey's, 1990), p. 205Google Scholar.

¹⁸ Kennan, George F., “Morality and Foreign Affairs,” Foreign Affairs 64 (Winter 1985–86), p. 208CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹⁹ See Bernardin, Joseph Cardinal, “Ordering Our Destiny: Politics, Strategy, and Ethics,” in Kegley and Schwab, After the Cold War, pp. 149–56.Google Scholar

²⁰ Mueller, John, “The Obsolescence of Major War,” in Kegley, Charles W. Jr., and Wittkopf, Eugene R., eds., The Global Agenda, 3rd ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1992), pp. 39–48.Google Scholar

²¹ Cited in McNamara, Robert S., “Alternative Visions of a Post-Cold War World,” Wingspread 13 (Summer 1991), p. 12Google Scholar.

²² Luttwak, Edward, “From Geopolitics to Geo-Economics,” The National Interest 20 (Summer 1990), pp. 17–23Google Scholar.

²³ Moran, Theodore H., “International Economics and U.S. Security,” in Kegley, Charles W. Jr., and Wittkopf, Eugene R., eds., The Future of American Foreign Policy (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1992), p. 337Google Scholar.

²⁴ Nye, Joseph S. Jr., “The Changing Nature of World Power,” in Kegley, Charles W. Jr., and Wittkopf, Eugene R., eds., The Global Agenda, 3rd ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1992), p. 318.Google Scholar

²⁵ See Rosenau, James N., Turbulence in World Politics: Toward a Theory of Change and Continuity (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

²⁶ Joffe, Josef, “Entangled Forever,” in Kegley, Charles W. Jr., and Wittkopf, Eugene R., eds., The Future of American Foreign Policy (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1992), p. 35Google Scholar.

²⁷ Gaddis, John Lewis, “Coping with Victory,” in Kegley, Charles W. Jr., and Wittkopf, Eugene R., eds., The Future of American Foreign Policy (New York: St Martin's Press, 1992), p. 146Google Scholar.

²⁸ Morgenthau, Hans J., In Defense of the National Interest (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1951), p. 242Google Scholar.

²⁹ See Stoessinger, John G., Crusaders and Pragmatists (New York: Norton, 1985).Google Scholar

³⁰ See VanEvera, Stephen, “American Intervention in the Third World: Less Would Be Better,” in Kegley and Wittkopf, The Future of American Foreign Policy, pp. 285–300.Google Scholar

³¹ Herz, John H., Political Realism and Political Idealism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951).Google Scholar

³² Kegley, Charles W. Jr., “Neo-Idealism: A Practical Matter,” Ethics & International Affairs 2 (1988), pp. 173–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Kegley, Charles W. Jr., “The Lost Legacy: Idealism in American Foreign Policy,” USA Today 117 (March 1989), pp. 25–27Google Scholar.

³³ Kober, Stanley, “Idealpolitik,” Foreign Policy 79 (Summer 1990), pp. 3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

³⁴ Gaddis, “Coping with Victory,” p. 28.Google Scholar

³⁵ This rule, moreover, is deeply rooted in political philosophy worldwide since antiquity. Consider Diogenes Laërtius' dictum, “We ought to behave to our friends … as we wish our friends to behave toward us”; Isocrates' adage, “Do not do to others what angers you if done to you by others”; Pittacus' injunction, “Do not that to thy neighbor that thou wouldst not suffer for him;” Plato's statement of the same principle, “Do to others as I would say they should do to me;” and Hillel's pronouncement, “What is hateful to thyself do not do to another. This is the whole Law, the rest is Commentary.”Google Scholar

³⁶ Komorita, S. S., Hilty, J. A., and Parks, C. D., “Reciprocity and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 35 (September 1991), p. 495CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

³⁷ See Axelrod, Robert, The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books, 1984)Google Scholar, for an elaboration and demonstration of this principle.

³⁸ Rielly, John E., “Public Opinion: The Pulse of the ′90s,” in Kegley and Wittkopf, The Future of American Foreign Policy, p. 125.Google Scholar

³⁹ Americans Talk Security, Compendium: Results from Twelve National Surveys on National Security Issues Conducted from October 1987 to December 1989 (Boston: Americans Talk Security, 1988), pp. 287–89Google Scholar.

⁴⁰ Rielly, “Public Opinion.”.Google Scholar

⁴¹ See Diebel, Terry L., “Bush's Foreign Policy: Mastery and Inaction,” Foreign Policy 84 (Fall 1991), pp. 3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁴² See Kennedy, Paul, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers (New York: Random House, 1987Google Scholar).

⁴³ Calleo, David, “American National Interests and the New Europe: The Millennium Has Not Yet Arrived,” in Kegley and Wittkopf, The Future of American Foreign Policy, p. 190.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ See Carpenter, Ted Galen, “The New World Disorder,” Foreign Policy 84 (Fall 1991), pp. 24–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁴⁵ Gergen, David, “A New American Order,” US. News and World Report (June 17, 1991), p. 68.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Weisband, Edward, The Ideology of American Foreign Policy: A Paradigm of Lockean Liberalism (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1973Google Scholar).

⁴⁷ Dolbeare, Kenneth M. and Dolbeare, Patricia, American Ideologies (Chicago: Markham, 1971Google Scholar).

⁴⁸ Lipsitz, Lewis and Speak, David M., American Democracy, 2nd ed. (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1989).Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Cited in Gaddis, “Toward the Post-Cold War World,” p. 30.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Patterson, James and Kim, Peter, The Day America Told the Truth: What People Really Believe About Everything That Really Matters (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1991Google Scholar).

⁵¹ Schlesinger, , The Cycles of American History, p. 73Google Scholar.

⁵² Ibid., p. 17.Google Scholar

⁵³ See Kegley, Charles W. Jr., “The New Containment Myth: Realism and the Anomaly of European Integration,” Ethics & International Affairs 5 (1991), pp. 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵⁴ Carpenter, “The New World Disorder,” pp. 37–38.Google Scholar