Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:18:12.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Liberals, Revolutionaries, and Responsibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2012

Catherine Lu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This brief response cannot adequately address all of the challenging issues raised by Robert Meister in his reply, so I hope only to clarify our main points of contention that will likely continue beyond this exchange.

Type
Debate
Information
Ethics & International Affairs , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , September 2002 , pp. 124 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The question of whether military intervention is the most morally effective option in any given case will depend on a host of other moral considerations and contextual factors.

2 Shklar, Judith N Putting Cruelty First in Ordinary Vices 1984 CambridgeHarvard University Press 2829Google Scholar.

3 Dyzenhaus, DavidSurvey Article:Justifying the Truth and Reconciliation Commission Journal of Political Philosophy 2000 8 no. 4p.495Google Scholar.

4 Schmitt, CarlSchwab, GeorgeThe Concept of the Political 1976 New Brunswick, N.J.Rutgers University Press 5467Google Scholar.

5 Gray, J GlennThe Warriors: Reflections on Men in Battle 1998 Lincoln, Neb.University of Nebraska PressGoogle Scholar [1959]), p.168.