² O'Neil, Onora, “Kantian Ethics,” in Singer, Peter, ed., A Companion to Ethics (Oxford: Blackwell, 1991), 183.Google Scholar

³ Kant, Immanuel, The Metaphysics of Morals, intr. and trans. Mary Gregor (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 55–56Google Scholar. See Höffe, Otfried, Kategorische Rechtsprinzipien (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1990), 63–75Google Scholar, and Laberge, Pierre, “Kant on Justice and the Law of Nations,” in Mapel, David R. and Nardin, Terry, eds., The Constitution of International Society (forthcoming).Google Scholar

⁴ Adelman, Howard, “The Ethics of Humanitarian Intervention: The Case of the Kurdish Refugees,” Public Affairs Quarterly 6 (January 1992), 62Google Scholar.

⁵ René-Jean Dupuis, “L'ingérence internationale, jusqu'où?”Etudes (1992), 16.Google Scholar

⁶ D'Amato, Anthony, “Israel's Air Strike upon the Iraqi Nuclear Reactor,” American Journal of International Law 77 (1983), 585CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁷ I borrow this interpretation from the course Le droit et la guerre given by Professor Georges Abi-Saab in 1990–91 in Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar

⁸ I shall not discuss any possible duty to intervene, but only permission to intervene. On this distinction, see Luca, Donatella, “Intervention humanitaire: questions et reflexions,” International Journal of Refugee Law 5 (1993), 426–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On the other hand, I often hear jurists say that they prefer to see the Charter adjusted by interpretation and practice rather than by amendment. This would not, however, eliminate my problem. It would simply force me to reformulate it: Should one, in the light of the three ethical theories we will examine, hope for an adjustment of the Charter by interpretation and practice?

⁹ Kant, Immanuel, On History, ed. Beck, Lewis White (New York: Macmillan, 1963), 89.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Beitz, Charles, “Bounded Morality: Justice and the State in World Politics,” International Organization 33 (Summer 1979), 413CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹¹ Cavallar, Georg, Pax kantiana (Wien: Böhlau, 1992), 124–28Google Scholar. For a somewhat different view, see Bernard Bourgeois, “Kant et la révolution francaise (la guerre)” in Bourgeois, Bernard and D'Hondt, Jacques, eds., La philosophie et la révolution francaise (Paris: Vrin, 1993), 277–86Google Scholar.

¹² Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971), 12, 17–22, 152–53.Google Scholar

¹³ Ibid., 8, 378.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Rawls, John, “The Law of Peoples,” in Shute, Stephen and Hurley, Susan, eds., On Human Rights (New York: Basic Books, 1993), 41–82Google Scholar. It is important to note, however, that “The Law of Peoples” only allows humanitarian intervention in “outlaw regimes”; not only liberal Rawlsian societies, but liberal societies in general, even societies that Rawls calls “hierarchical,” are protected by the principle of nonintervention.

¹⁵ Rawls considers this limitation obvious. “Obviously, a principle such as…that of nonintervention…will have to be qualified…it fails in the case of disordered societies in which wars and serious violations of human rights are endemic.” Ibid., 56.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Wicclair, Mark R., “Rawls and the Principle of Nonintervention,” in Blocker, H. Gene and Smith, Elizabeth H., eds., John Rawls' Theory of Social Justice (Athens: Ohio University Press, 1980), 289, 292, 299–301.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Tesón, Fernando, “The Kantian Theory of International Law,” Columbia Law Review 92 (January 1992), 92CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹⁸ Tesón, Fernando, Humanitarian Intervention: An Inquiry into Law and Morality (Ardsley-on-Hudson: Transnational Publishers, 1988), 63Google Scholar.

¹⁹ Tesón, “The Kantian Theory of International Law,” 84.Google Scholar

²⁰ See Laberge, , “L'aide liée au respect des droits de 1'homme et le relativisme culturel,” in Höffe, Otfried, ed., La politique et les droits (Presses universitaires de Caen, 1992), 181–202.Google Scholar

²¹ Wicclair, , “Rawls and the Principle of Nonintervention,” 302Google Scholar.

²² Mill, John Stuart, “A Few Words on Nonintervention,” in Essays on Equality, Law, and Education (Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1984), 118.Google ScholarRousseau, Jean-Jacques, Discours sur I'inégalité (Paris: Garnier-Flammarion, 1971), 207Google Scholar.

²³ Mill, “A Few Words on Nonintervention,” 118–23.Google Scholar

²⁴ Kant, , On History, 3Google Scholar.

²⁵ Walzer, Michael, Just and Unjust Wars (New York: Basic Books, 1977), 90, 93, 101Google Scholar, and The Moral Standing of States: A Response to Four Critics,” in Beitz, Charles R., Cohen, Marshall, and Simmons, A. John, eds., International Ethics (Princeton University Press, 1985), 226.Google Scholar

²⁶ Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars, 51–124.Google Scholar

²⁷ Ibid., 51, 53, 54; and Walzer, “The Moral Standing of States,” 219.Google Scholar

²⁸ Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars, 89, 58.Google Scholar

²⁹ Tesón, “The Kantian Theory of International Law,” 92.Google Scholar

³⁰ Walzer, , Just and Unjust Wars, 89Google Scholar.

³¹ Walzer, , “The Moral Standing of States,” 220Google Scholar.

³² Ibid., 224.Google Scholar

³³ Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars, 93, 102, 108, and “The Moral Standing of States,” 225.Google Scholar

³⁴ Walzer, , Just and Unjust Wars, 94, 97–101Google Scholar.

³⁵ Walzer, , “The Moral Standing of States,” 226Google Scholar.

³⁶ Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars, 104–106. On this question, see Franck, Thomas M. and Rodley, Nigel S., “After Bangladesh: The Law of Humanitarian Intervention by Military Force,” American Journal of International Law 67 (1973), 275–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

³⁷ See, for example, (1) four reviews of Just and Unjust Wars by (a) Wasserstrom, Richard A., Harvard Law Review 92 (1978), 536–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar, (b) Doppelt, Gerald, Philosophy and Public Affairs 8 (1978), 3–36Google Scholar, (c) Beitz, Charles R., International Organization 33 (1979), 405–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and (d) Luban, David(inspired by the “basic rights” theory of Henry Shue), Philosophy and Public Affairs 9 (Winter 1980), 161–81Google Scholar; (2) the second part of Beitz, Charles R., Political Theory and International Relations (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985)Google Scholar; (3) the reply of Walzer to his four critics in “The Moral Standing of States”; (4) the replies to this reply by Doppelt, , Philosophy and Public Affairs 9 (1980), 398–403Google Scholar, Luban, , Philosophy and Public Affairs 9 (Summer 1980)Google Scholar, Beitz, , Philosophy and Public Affairs 9 (1980), 385–90Google Scholar; (5) articles by (a) Slater, Jerome and Nardin, Terry, “Nonintervention and Human Rights,” Journal of Politics 48 (1986), 86–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar, (b) McMahan, Jeff, “The Ethics of International Intervention,” in Ellis, Anthony, ed., Ethics and International Affairs (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1986), 24–51.Google Scholar, (c) Beitz, , “The Reagan Doctrine in Nicaragua,” in Luper-Foy, Steven, ed., Problems of International Justice (Boulder and London: West view Press, 1988), 182–85.Google Scholar, (d) Smith, Michael J., “Ethics and Intervention,” Ethics & International Affairs 3 (1989), 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and (e) Mapel, David R., “Military Intervention and Rights,” Millennium 20 (1991), 41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

³⁸ Charles R. Beitz, “The Reagan Doctrine in Nicaragua,” 188.Google Scholar

³⁹ Charles R. Beitz, Political Theory and International Relations, 76–77.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Walzer, , Just and Unjust Wars, 54Google Scholar.

⁴¹ Beitz, Political Theory and International Relations, 78–81, 90.Google Scholar

⁴² Beitz, , “Bounded Morality,” 415Google Scholar.

⁴³ Beitz, , “The Reagan Doctrine in Nicaragua,” 188Google Scholar.

⁴⁴ Beitz, , “Bounded Morality,” 413Google Scholar.

⁴⁵ Ibid., 415.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Quoted in Torelli, Maurice, “L'humanitaire: le retour au realisme?” Arés 14 (1994), 71–81Google Scholar.

⁴⁷ Walzer, , “The Moral Standing of States,” 237Google Scholar.

⁴⁸ Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars, 54, and “The Moral Standing of States,” 219.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Walzer, “The Moral Standing of States,” 218–24.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Slater and Nardin, “Nonintervention and Human Rights,” 91.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Mapel, , “Military Intervention and Rights,” 44Google Scholar.

⁵² Slater and Nardin, “Nonintervention and Human Rights,” 90–91.Google Scholar

⁵³ Ibid., 91, and Mapel, “Military Intervention and Rights,” 42–5.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ In reply to a worry voiced by Slater and Nardin, Walzer could allow a fourth rule, which is really a variation on the first. The worry is that there could easily be a historical community that organizes itself to oppress its minorities. Would one then have to close one's eyes to this oppression out of respect for the metaphorical contract of this community? But Walzer could of course consider these minorities subcommunities similar to those engaged in a struggle for national liberation, and then the first rule of derogation would allow intervention to help them. See also Nardin, Terry, “Sovereignty, Self-determination, and International Intervention,” in Lopez, George A. and Christiansen, Drew, eds., Morals and Might (Boulder: West view Press, 1993), 137–52Google Scholar.

⁵⁵ Beitz, “Nonintervention and Communal Integrity,” 388–89; Mapel, “Military Intervention and Rights,” 47.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Adelman, Howard, “Humanitarian Intervention: The Case of the Kurds,” International Journal of Refugee Law 4 (1992), 18, 38Google Scholar.

⁵⁷ Howard Adelman, “The Ethics of Humanitarian Intervention,” 62.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Adelman, , “Humanitarian Intervention, 5. On this question see also Chantal Carpentier,” La resolution 68 (1991)Google Scholar du Conseil de sécurité: quel devoir d'ingérence?”Etudes, Internationales 23 (1992), 279–317Google Scholar; Jackson, Robert H., “Armed Humanitarianism,” International Journal 48 (1993), 579–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Roberts, Adam, “Humanitarian War: Military Intervention and Human Rights,” International Affairs 69 (1993), 429–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁵⁹ Adelman, , “Humanitarian Intervention,” 24Google Scholar.

⁶⁰ Humphrey, John P., “Foreword,” in Lillich, Richard B., ed., Humanitarian Intervention and the United Nations (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1973), vii–ix.Google Scholar

⁶¹ Adelman, , “Humanitarian Intervention,” 26, 30–31Google Scholar.

⁶² Adelman, “The Ethics of Humanitarian Intervention,” 75–76, emphasis added.Google Scholar

⁶³ See, for example, Adelman, “Humanitarian Intervention,” 37–38.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Ibid., 30, 33.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Adelman, , “The Ethics of Humanitarian Intervention,” 76Google Scholar.

⁶⁶ Adelman, , “Humanitarian Intervention,” 38Google Scholar.

⁶⁷ Ibid., 31.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Ibid.,.Google Scholar