Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:08:11.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Casual War: NATO's Intervention in Kosovo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2012

Carl Cavanagh Hodge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the most remarkable features of contemporary international relations is the new prestige accorded universal standards of human rights. However, NATO's attempt to redeem the promise of human rights by way of military intervention during the recent Kosovo crisis may have established a disturbing precedent for humanitarianism. The Alliance exploited the capabilities of precision weaponry and digital information systems to wage war with air power alone, thus avoiding entirely the deployment of ground troops and the domestic political exposure such a deployment inevitably involves. The best available evidence is that this approach had little immediate effect on the atrocities carried out by Serbian troops in Kosovo and that NATO's overriding concern with casualty-avoidance in war undermined both the effectiveness and the moral legitimacy of humanitarian intervention. Even more disturbing is the question whether NATO's action implies that states endowed with the advanced military assets that were brought to bear against Serbia will adopt a casual policy on the conduct of limited war, a policy at odds with the lessons of the twentieth century.

Type
The Meaning of Kosovo
Information
Ethics & International Affairs , Volume 14 , March 2000 , pp. 39 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Du Pouvoir, reprinted as de Jouvenel, Bertrand, On Power: The Natural History of Its Growth (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1993), p. 11Google Scholar.

2 See any edition of Carl von Clausewitz, On War, bk. 5, chap. 3. See also Murray, Williamson, “Thinking About Revolutions in Military Affairs,” Joint Forces Quarterly (Summer 1997), pp. 69–76Google Scholar.

3 Aron, Raymond, The Century of Total War (New York: Doubleday, 1954), p. 19Google Scholar.

4 Ibid., pp. 9, 28Google Scholar.

5 Keegan, John, War and Our World: The Reith Lectures, 1998 (London: Hutchinson, 1998), p. 44Google Scholar.

6 Craig, Campbell, Destroying the Village: Eisenhower and Thermonuclear War (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998), p. 67Google Scholar.

7 Luttwack, Edward, “Toward Post-Heroic Warfare,” Foreign Affairs 74 (1995), pp. 110, 112–13Google Scholar. See also Luttwack's, On Strategy: The Logic of War and Peace (Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1987Google Scholar); and Mueller, John, Retreat from Doomsday: The Obsolescence of Major War (New York: Basic Books, 1989Google Scholar).

8 See Yost, David A., NATO Transformed: The Alliance's New Roles in International Security (Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace, 1998), pp. 9–35, 275Google Scholar.

9 Ibid., p. 291Google Scholar.

10 Krasner, Stephen D., Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999), pp. 84–90, 98–103Google Scholar. Krasner points out first that since Westphalia, sovereignty has seldom enjoyed in substance the prestige accorded in principle and, consequently, that contemporary challenges to the principle of national sovereignty generally are less novel and radical than is assumed.

11 Ignatieff, Michael, “The Virtual Commander,” The New Yorker (August 2, 1999), p. 36Google Scholar. Elsewhere he observes a “moral disconnection” between the new warmakers of ethnonationalism and liberal interventionists “who represent our moral stakes,” but the disconnect of relevance to NATO's Kosovo intervention was that between the humanitarian claims of its goals and the human price the Atlantic Alliance was prepared to pay for their achievement. The Warrior's Honor: Ethnic War and the Modern Conscience (London: Chatto & Windus, 1998), p. 6Google Scholar.

12 Gentry, John A., “The Cancer of Human Rights,” Washington Quarterly 22 (Autumn 1999), pp. 95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Troebst, Stefan, Conflict in Kosovo: An Analytical Documentation, 1992–1998 (Flensburg: European Center for Minority Issues, 1998), p. 105Google Scholar. The Contact Group consisted of France, Germany, Italy, Russian Federation, United Kingdom, and United States of America.

14 Clines, Francis X., “NATO Opens Barrage against Serbs as Clinton Denounces Brutal Repression,” New York Times, March 25, 1999Google Scholar.

15 Freedman, Lawrence and Karsh, Efraim, The Gulf Conflict, 1990–1991: Diplomacy and War in the New World Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993), p. 94Google Scholar.

16 Human Rights in Kosovo: As Seen, As Told,” http://www.osce.org/kosovo/reports/hr/index.htm (OSCE, 1999), p. 3Google Scholar. The OSCE observer mission withdrew from Kosovo on March 20. The bombing commenced on March 24.

17 Aron, Raymond, On War, trans. Terence K. Imartin (New York: Doubleday Anchor, 1959), p. 59Google Scholar.

18 Towle, Philip, Cambridge University, “NATO's Strategic Bombardment Campaign against Serbia in 1999” (paper presented to the Annual Conference of the Committee on Atlantic Studies, American University of Paris, October 15–17, 1999), p. 3Google Scholar.

19 Ibid., pp. 2–3Google Scholar.

20 Krauthammer, Charles, “The Road to Hell: Clinton, Kosovo and Good Intentions,” Washington Post, April 2, 1999, p. A29Google Scholar.

21 Brzezinski, Zbigniew, “To Stop the Serbs,” Washington Post, March 30, 1999, p. A17Google Scholar.

22 Hoge, Warren, “Blair's Anger Fuels Support for Strikes,” New York Times, March 31, 1999, http://www.nytimes.com/library/world/europe/033199kosovo-britain.htmlGoogle Scholar. Not until the end of May, however, did Blair pledge up to 50,000 troops for an invasion force. Sherwell, Philip, “Blair Pledges 50,000 Men for Invasion,” Daily Telegraph, May 30, 1999, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/etGoogle Scholar.

23 Towle, p. 1. See also Keegan, John, “Please, Mr. Blair, Never Take Such a Risk Again,” Daily Telegraph, June 6, 1999, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/etGoogle Scholar.

24 Jenkins, Simon, “A Victory for Cowards,” The Times, June 11, 1999, http://www.tbe-times.co.uk/news/pages/tim/99/06/11Google Scholar.

25 Cohen, Eliot A., “What's Wrong with the American Way of War?” Wall Street Journal, March 30, 1999, p. A26Google Scholar.

26 Howard, Michael, “Empires, Nations and Wars,” Yigal Allon Memorial Lectures, University of Tel Aviv, March 1982Google Scholar, reprinted in The Lessons of History (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), p. 48.

27 Luttwak, Edward N., “Give War a Chance,” Foreign Affairs 78 (1999), pp. 36–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.