Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:28:23.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Torture Lite”: A Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Features
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Wolfendale also includes mock execution among the forms of torture lite, although I believe it is usually taken to be an unambiguous instance of full-blown torture.

2 Although we do seem to mark such a distinction in our intuitions about punishment. With the possible exception of the death penalty, we seem to consider corporal and mutilative punishment beyond the pale while allowing people to be imprisoned for decades, even though a reasonable person might well choose the former over the latter. It is not clear how we might redeem this intuition if physical assaults are not as such more morally objectionable than psychological ones.

3 I have discussed this consideration at greater length in “What's Wrong with Torture?” Philosophy & Public Affairs 33, no. 1 (2005), pp. 1–34.

4 Artistotle, Nicomachean Ethics 1102a1-5.