Article contents
Russia and the Liberal World Order
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 March 2018
Abstract
While Russian leaders are clearly dissatisfied with the United States and the European Union, they are not inherently opposed to a liberal world order. The question of Russia's desire to change a liberal international order hangs on the type of liberalism embedded in that order. Despite some calls from within for it to create a new, post-liberal order premised on conservative nationalism and geopolitics, Russia is unlikely to fare well in such a world.
- Type
- Roundtable: Rising Powers and the International Order
- Information
- Ethics & International Affairs , Volume 32 , Special Issue 1: Rising Powers and the International Order , Spring 2018 , pp. 45 - 59
- Copyright
- Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 2018
References
NOTES
1 Andrey Kortunov, “The Inevitable, Weird World,” Russia in Global Affairs No. 4 (October–December 2016), eng.globalaffairs.ru/number/The-Inevitable-Weird-World-18385; and Sergei Karaganov, “Global Challenges and Russian Foreign Policy,” Russia in Global Affairs, November 20, 2016, eng.globalaffairs.ru/pubcol/Global-Challenges-and-Russias-Foreign-Policy-18468.
2 Clunan, Anne L., The Social Construction of Russia's Resurgence (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009)Google Scholar and Clunan, Anne L., “Historical Aspirations and the Domestic Politics of Russia's Pursuit of International Status,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 47, no. 3–4 (2014), pp. 281–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 Fyodor Lukyanov, “In the Moonlight,” Russia in Global Affairs No. 3 (July–September 2017), eng.globalaffairs.ru/number/In-the-Moonlight-19035.
4 Alexander Losev, “Neo-Mercantilism, Neo-Modernism or Neo-Imperialism?” No. 3 (July–September 2017), eng.globalaffairs.ru/number/Neo-Mercantilism-Neo-Modernism-or-Neo-Imperialism-19038.
5 Ruggie, John Gerard, “Multilateralism,” International Organization 46, no. 3 (1992), pp. 561–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ikenberry, G. John, After Victory (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2001)Google Scholar; and Ikenberry, G. John, “The Liberal International Order and Its Discontents,” Millenium 38, no. 3 (2010), pp. 509–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Simpson, Gerry, “Two Liberalisms,” European Journal of International Law 12, no. 3 (2001), pp. 537–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 Ibid., p. 539.
8 Kortunov, “The Inevitable.”
9 Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Buzan, Barry, From International to World Society? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ruggie, John Gerard, “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change,” International Organization 36, no. 2 (1982), pp. 379–415 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Ruggie, “Multilateralism.”
10 Strange, Susan, “Cave! Hic Dragones,” International Organization 36, no. 2 (1982), pp. 479–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11 Simpson, “Two Liberalisms.”
12 Ibid., p. 537.
13 Clunan, Anne L., “Redefining Sovereignty,” in Shawki, Noha and Cox, Michaelene, eds., Negotiating Sovereignty and Human Rights: Actors and Issues in Contemporary Human Rights Politics (Farnham, U.K.: Ashgate Publishing, 2009), pp. 7–26 Google Scholar.
14 Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect, “Resources: Security Council Resolutions Referencing R2P,” January 7, 2016, www.globalr2p.org/resources/335.
15 Blyth, Mark, Great Transformations (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
16 Blyth, Mark, Austerity (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar.
17 Ruggie, “International Regimes”; and Blyth, Great Transformations.
18 Bordo, Michael D. et al. , “Is Globalization Today Really Different than Globalization a Hundred Years Ago?” in Collins, Susan and Lawrence, Robert, eds., Brookings Trade Policy Forum (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1999), pp. 1–72 Google Scholar.
19 Falk, Richard, “State of Siege,” International Affairs 73, no. 1 (1997), pp. 123–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
20 Clunan, Social Construction; and Trenin, Dmitri, Post-Imperium (Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2011)Google Scholar.
21 Tsygankov, Andrei, Russia and the West from Alexander to Putin (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
22 Clunan, Social Construction.
23 Sergei Karaganov, “2016—A Victory of Conservative Realism,” Russia in Global Affairs No. 1 (January–March 2017), eng.globalaffairs.ru/number/2016–A-Victory-of-Conservative-Realism-18585.
24 Makarychev, Andrey and Morozov, Viatcheslav, “Multilateralism, Multipolarity, and Beyond,” Global Governance 17, no. 3 (2011), pp. 353–73Google Scholar.
25 Sovet po Vneshnei i Oboronnoi Politike, “Strategiia dlia Rossii. Rossiiskaia Vneshnaia Politika: konets 2010x-nachalo 2020x” [Council for Foreign and Defense Policy, “A Strategy for Russia. Russian Foreign Policy: The End of the 2010s–the Beginning of the 2020s”], May 23, 2016, svop.ru/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/тезисы_23мая_sm.pdf.
26 Karaganov, “Global Challenges.”
27 Makarychev and Morozov, “Multilateralism.”
28 Sergei Karaganov, “How the World Looks from the Russian Perspective,” Russia in Global Affairs, August 1, 2016, eng.globalaffairs.ru/pubcol/How-the-World-Looks-From-the-Russian-Perspective-18303.
29 Karaganov, “Global Challenges.”
30 Ibid.
31 Ibid.
32 Ibid.; and Karaganov, “2016—A Victory.”
33 Karaganov, “How the World Looks.”
34 D'Agostino, Anthony, The Rise of Global Powers (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar.
35 Doyle, Michael W., Ways of War and Peace (New York: W. W. Norton, 1997), pp. 389–420 Google Scholar.
36 Karaganov, “2016.”
37 Kortunov, “The Inevitable.”
38 Ibid.
39 Karaganov, “2016.”
40 Ibid.; Losev, “Neo-Mercantilism”; and Kortunov, “The Inevitable.”
41 Larson, Deborah Welch and Shevchenko, Alexei, “Shortcut to Greatness,” International Organization 57, no. 1 (2003), pp. 77–109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Clunan, “Historical Aspirations”; Lukyanov, “In the Moonlight”; and Makarychev and Morozov, “Multilateralism.”
42 Losev, “Neo-Mercantilism”; and Chubais, Igor, Ot Russkoi Idei–k Idee Novoi Rossii (Moscow: Izdatel'skii dom “Sotsial'naia zashchita,” 1997)Google Scholar.
43 World Bank, “Russian Federation - Systematic Country Diagnostic: Pathways to Inclusive Growth,” Washington, D.C., 2016, documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/477441484190095052/Russian-Federation-Systematic-country-diagnostic-Pathways-to-inclusive-growth; World Bank, “GDP Ranking 2016” (July 2017), data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/GDP-ranking-table; and World Bank, “World Development Indicators Database” (November 15, 2017), databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators.
44 Sil, Rudra, “Which of the BRICS Will Wield the Most Influence in Twenty-Five Years?” International Studies Review 16, no. 3 (2014), pp. 456–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
45 Losev, “Neo-Mercantilism.”
46 Strange, Susan, “Wake up, Krasner! The World Has Changed,” Review of International Political Economy 1, no. 2 (1994), pp. 209–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cerny, Philip G., “Globalization and the Changing Logic of Collective Action,” International Organization 49, no. 4 (1995), pp. 595–625 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Blyth, Austerity.
47 Anne L. Clunan, “The Great Powers of Small-Scale,” Paper prepared for delivery at the International Studies Association Annual Convention, Toronto, Canada, March 26–29, 2014; and Brooks, Stephen G., Producing Security (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
48 Jude Clemente, “U.S. Set to Rival Russia in Oil and Gas Exports,” Forbes, February 25, 2017; and International Energy Agency, “Key World Energy Statistics 2017,” www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/KeyWorld2017.pdf.
49 Andrei Soldatov and Irina Borogan, The Red Web (Philadelphia: Perseus Books Group, 2015).
50 Milanovic, Branko, Global Inequality (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
- 22
- Cited by