Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T09:12:59.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Rules of the Game

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2012

Stanley Hoffmann
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

International systems have historically come in two forms: those based on the balance of power and those of a revolutionary nature, including systems organized around bipolar competition. Hoffmann finds the world order of 1987 to contain both these systems and judges it both ambiguous and original. While the tension of these extremes can make the world appear “anarchical,” there are certain agreed upon rules by which the superpowers interact. These rules ultimately preserve order by embracing competition between the United States and the Soviet Union; superpower confrontation is prevented by each nation holding to their own ideals and sovereignty while embracing nuclear deterrence. Having revealed the rules of the superpower game, Hoffmann then subjects them to ethical judgment. Despite the historic duration of peace between superpowers that seems to have been sustained by these rules, Hoffmann finds them both ethically flawed and ultimately unstable. Turning to a brief consideration of United States foreign policy, he points to particular moral difficulties in U.S. stances and urges the development of superpower rules that are effective and ethical.

Type
Special Section: Superpower Ethics
Information
Ethics & International Affairs , Volume 1 , March 1987 , pp. 37 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Duties Beyond Borders (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1981)Google Scholar; Nye, Joseph S. Jr., Nuclear Ethics (New York: The Free Press, 1986)Google Scholar.

2 Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Aron, Raymond, Peace and War (New York: Doubleday, 1966)Google Scholar part four.

4 For the most recent restatement, see Aron, Raymond, Les dernières années du siecle (Paris: Commentaire Julliard, 1984)Google Scholar; Gaddis, John L., “The Long Peace,” International Security 10:4 (Spring 1986) 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Keohane, Robert, “Reciprocity in International Relations,” International Organization 40:1 (Summer 1986) 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Mandelbaum, Michael, “Nuclear Weapons and World Politics,” in Gompert, David C., et al., eds., Nuclear Weapons and World Politics (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1977) 15–74Google Scholar; Nye, Joseph S. Jr., “Nuclear Learning in U.S.—Soviet Regimes,” unpublished paperGoogle Scholar.

7 See Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society, op. cit.Google Scholar; Gaddis, John L., “The Long Peace,” op. cit.Google Scholar See also Hoffmann, Stanley, Janus and Minerva (Boulder: Westview Press, 1986), chaps. 5 and 6Google Scholar.

8 Bundy, McGeorge, “The Bishops and the Bomb,” New York Review (June 16, 1986)Google Scholar.

9 Nye, Joseph S. Jr., Nuclear Ethics, op. cit., 61Google Scholar.

10 Hoffmann, Stanley, Janus and Minerva, op. cit., chap. 5Google Scholar.

11 Tucker, Robert W., Intervention and the Reagan Doctrine (New York: Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs, 1985)Google Scholar.

12 Keohane, Robert, After Hegemony (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984)Google Scholar.