Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:52:51.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Basic Moral Values: A Shared Core

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2012

Frances V. Harbour
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We have to explain not only why there is so much difference between cultures on ethical questions, but also why there is so much concurrence at a general level. If the most basic ethical values are objective and cultures use those basic building stones to construct implicit ethical arguments in the form of secondary and tertiary values, then we have an explanation for both similarities and differences. The base-line core is shred; the upper tiers differ by culture. Requiring cross-cultural concurrence not only separates out core values from secondary ones, but also provides a check that a whole culture has not gone awry due to local circumstances. Without some form of objectivity, there is no firm grounding other than taste for criticizing whatever happen to be another culture's values, or even for reforming one's own. Without objectivity there is no firm grounding for moral objections to someone from a different culture - such as Hitler or Idi Amin.

Type
Articles
Information
Ethics & International Affairs , Volume 9 , March 1995 , pp. 155 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kroeber, Alfred Louis and Kluckhohn, Clyde, “Culture,” in Reid, Charles L., ed., Choice and Action: An Introduction to Ethics (New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1981), 60Google Scholar.

2 Ibid., 59–61.Google Scholar

3 Beauchamp, Tom, Philosophical Ethics: An Introduction to Moral Philosophy (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1982), 339Google Scholar.

4 Moore, G. E., Principia Ethica (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1903), 6–8Google Scholar. It does not matter for the purposes of my argument whether Moore is correct in his assessment that using a naturalistic definition of normative terms is formally a logical fallacy since I am proposing a nonnaturalistic definition.

5 Feldman, Fred, Introductory Ethics (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1978), 199–200Google Scholar.

6 Beauchamp, Philosophical Ethics, 352–55.Google Scholar

7 Frankena, William K., Thinking about Morality (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1980), 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Feldman, Fred, Introductory Ethics (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1978), 216–17Google Scholar.

9 Mackie, J. L., Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong (New York: Penguin Books, 1977), 33Google Scholar.

10 Kant, Immanuel, The Metaphysical Elements of Justice: Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Ladd, John (New York: MacMillan, 1965), 14–16.Google Scholar

11 Mackie, Ethics, 36–37.Google Scholar

12 Ibid.Google Scholar

13 Toulmin, Stephen, Rieke, Richard, and Janik, Allan, Introduction to Reasoning, 2nd ed. (New York: MacMillan, 1984), 397–98.Google Scholar

14 Lauri Goodstein, ‘“Declaration of a Global Ethic’ Signed at Religious Parliament”Washington Post, September 3, 1993, 3.Google Scholar

15 Bowie, Norman, “Moral Obligations of Multinational Corporations,” in Luper-Foy, Steven, ed., Problems of International Justice (Boulder: Westview Press, 1988), 107Google Scholar.

16 Lewis, C. S., The Abolition of Man: How Education Develops Man's Sense of Morality (New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1947), 95–120Google Scholar; Brandt, Richard B., “Relativism and Ultimate Disagreements about Ethical Principles,” in Beauchamp, , Philosophical Ethics, 38.Google Scholar; Schwarz, Shalom H. and Bilsky, Wolfgang, “Toward a Theory of the Universal Content and Structure of Values: Extensions and Cross-Cultural Replications,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58 (May 1990), 881Google Scholar.

17 Tzu, Sun, The Art of War, trans. Cleary, Thomas (Boston: Shambhala Publications, 1991), 4.Google Scholar

18 Plato, , The Republic and Other Works, trans. Jowett, B. J. (Garden City: Doubleday, 1973), 83, 91.Google Scholar

19 Wakin, Malham, “The Ethics of Leadership,” in Wakin, Malham, ed., War, Morality, and the Military Profession, 1st ed. (Boulder: Westview Press, 1979), 214.Google Scholar

20 Ballou, Adin, “Christian Non-Resistance,” in Lynd, Staughton ed., Nonviolence in America: A Documentary History (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1966), 31.Google Scholar, quoted in Wasserstrom, Richard, “On the Morality of War,” in Wasserstrom, , ed., War and Morality (Belmont: Wadsworth, 1970), 92Google Scholar.

21 Holmes, Robert L., On War and Morality (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989), 193CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 al-Shaybani, Muhammad ibn al-Hasan, The Islamic Law of Nations, ed. and trans. Khadduri, Majid (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1966)Google Scholar, sec. 117, as quoted in Kelsay, John, Islam and War (Louisville: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1993), 65Google Scholar.

23 See, for example, Finnis, John, Boyle, Joseph, and Grisez, Germain, Nuclear Deterrence, Morality, and Realism (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987), 88–90Google Scholar.

24 Kelsay, John, “Religion and the Governance of War: The Case of Classical Islam,” Journal of Religious Ethics 18 (Fall 1990), 129–31Google Scholar; see also, Mahmassani, Sobhi, “International Law in Light of Islamic Doctrine,” in Academic de Droit International, Recueil des cours 117 (1966), 307–8Google Scholar. Most contemporary Islamic jurists accept the legal rules embodied in the Geneva Protocols and other treaties on POWs as currently binding. See Mayer, Elizabeth Ann, “War and Peace in the Islamic Tradition and International Law,” in Kelsay, John and Johnson, James Turner, eds., Just War and Jihad: Historical and Theoretical Perspectives on War and Peace in Western and Islamic Traditions (New York: Greenwood Press, 1991), 198Google Scholar.

25 Viswanatha, S. V., International Law in Ancient India (Bombay: Longmans, Green & Co., 1925), 156.Google Scholar; quoted in Walzer, Michael, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, 1st ed. (New York: Basic Books, 1977), 43.Google Scholar

26 Ford, John C., S. J., “The Morality of Obliteration Bombing,” in Wasserstrom, , War and Morality, 26.Google Scholar

27 Nagel, Thomas, The View from Nowhere (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986), 182Google Scholar.

28 Nagel, Thomas, Mortal Questions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979), 128Google Scholar.