Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:02:25.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Unique ergodicity of the horocycle flow on Riemannnian foliations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2018

F. ALCALDE CUESTA
Affiliation:
Instituto de Matemáticas, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Rúa Lope Gómez de Marzoa s/n, E-15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain email [email protected]
F. DAL’BO
Affiliation:
IRMAR, Bâtiment 22, Campus de Beaulieu, Université Rennes 1, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France email [email protected]
M. MARTÍNEZ
Affiliation:
IMERL, Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de la República, Julio Herrera y Reissig 565, 11300 Montevideo, Uruguay email [email protected]
A. VERJOVSKY
Affiliation:
Instituto de Matemáticas (Unidad Cuernavaca), UNAM. Av. Universidad s/n, Col. Lomas de Chamilpa CP 62210, Cuernavaca, Mexico email [email protected]

Abstract

A classic result due to Furstenberg is the strict ergodicity of the horocycle flow for a compact hyperbolic surface. Strict ergodicity is unique ergodicity with respect to a measure of full support, and therefore it implies minimality. The horocycle flow has been previously studied on minimal foliations by hyperbolic surfaces on closed manifolds, where it is known not to be minimal in general. In this paper, we prove that for the special case of Riemannian foliations, strict ergodicity of the horocycle flow still holds. This, in particular, proves that this flow is minimal, which establishes a conjecture proposed by Matsumoto. The main tool is a theorem due to Coudène, which he presented as an alternative proof for the surface case. It applies to two continuous flows defining a measure-preserving action of the affine group of the line on a compact metric space, precisely matching the foliated setting. In addition, we briefly discuss the application of Coudène’s theorem to other kinds of foliations.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahlfors, L. and Bers, L.. Riemann’s mapping theorem for variable metrics. Ann. of Math. (2) 72 (1960), 385404.Google Scholar
Alcalde Cuesta, F.. Groupoïde d’homotopie d’un feuilletage Riemannien et réalisation symplectique de certaines variétés de Poisson. Publ. Mat. 33(3) (1989), 395410.Google Scholar
Alcalde Cuesta, F. and Dal’Bo, F.. Remarks on the dynamics of the horocycle flow for homogeneous foliations by hyperbolic surfaces. Expo. Math. 33(4) (2015), 431451.Google Scholar
Alcalde Cuesta, F., Dal’Bo, F., Martínez, M. and Verjovsky, A.. Minimality of the horocycle flow on laminations by hyperbolic surfaces with non-trivial topology. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 36(9) (2016), 46194635. Corrigendum to ‘Minimality of the horocycle flow on laminations by hyperbolic surfaces with non-trivial topology’. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 39(8) (2017), 4585–4586.Google Scholar
Alcalde Cuesta, F. and Hector, G.. Feuilletages en surfaces, cycles évanouissants et variétés de Poisson. Monatsh. Math. 124(3) (1997), 191213.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Y. and Martínez, M.. A characterization of harmonic measures on laminations by hyperbolic Riemann surfaces. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat. 44(6) (2008), 10781089.Google Scholar
Bonatti, C., Eskin, A. and Wilkinson, A.. Projective cocycles over $\text{SL}(2,\mathbb{R})$ actions: measures invariant under the upper triangular group. Preprint, 2016, arXiv:1709.02521.Google Scholar
Bonatti, C. and Gómez-Mont, X.. Sur le comportement statistique des feuilles de certains feuilletages holomorphes. Essays on Geometry and Related Topics (Monographs of L’Enseignement Mathématique, 38). Vols 1, 2. European Mathematical Society, Geneva, 2001, pp. 1541.Google Scholar
Candel, A.. Uniformization of surface laminations. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supèr. (4) 26(4) (1993), 489516.Google Scholar
Connell, C. and Martínez, M.. Harmonic and invariant measures on foliated spaces. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 369(7) (2017), 49314951.Google Scholar
Coudène, Y.. A short proof of the unique ergodicity of horocyclic flows. Ergodic Theory (Contemporary Mathematics, 485). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2009, pp. 8589.Google Scholar
Dal’Bo, F.. Geodesic and horocyclic trajectories. Universitext (EDP Sciences, Les Ulis). Springer, London, 2011. Translated from the 2007 French original.Google Scholar
Deroin, B. and Kleptsyn, V.. Random conformal dynamical systems. Geom. Funct. Anal. 17(4) (2007), 10431105.Google Scholar
Furstenberg, H.. The unique ergodicity of the horocycle flow. Recent Advances in Topological Dynamics (Proc. Conf., Yale University, New Haven, CN, 1972; in honor of Gustav Arnold Hedlund) (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 318). Springer, Berlin, 1973, pp. 95115.Google Scholar
Furstenberg, H.. Strict ergodicity and transformation of the torus. Amer. J. Math. 83 (1961), 573601.Google Scholar
Gallego, E., Gualandri, L., Hector, G. and Reventós, A.. Groupoïdes Riemanniens. Publ. Mat. 33(3) (1989), 417422.Google Scholar
Ghys, É. and Sergiescu, V.. Stabilité et conjugaison différentiable pour certains feuilletages. Topology 19(2) (1980), 179197.Google Scholar
Hedlund, G. A.. Fuchsian groups and transitive horocycles. Duke Math. J. 2(3) (1936), 530542.Google Scholar
Martínez, M., Matsumoto, S. and Verjovsky, A.. Horocycle flows for laminations by hyperbolic Riemann surfaces and Hedlund’s theorem. J. Mod. Dyn. 10 (2016), 113134.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, S.. The unique ergodicity of equicontinuous laminations. Hokkaido Math. J. 39(3) (2010), 389403.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, S.. Weak form of equidistribution theorem for harmonic measures of foliations by hyperbolic surfaces. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 144(3) (2016), 12891297.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, S.. Remarks on the horocycle flows for foliations by hyperbolic surfaces. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 145(1) (2017), 355362.Google Scholar
Molino, P.. Géométrie globale des feuilletages Riemanniens. Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Indag. Math. 44(1) (1982), 4576.Google Scholar
Molino, P.. Riemannian Foliations (Progress in Mathematics, 73). Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 1988. Translated from the French by Grant Cairns, with appendices by Cairns, Y. Carrière, É. Ghys, E. Salem and V. Sergiescu.Google Scholar
Ratner, Marina. Invariant measures and orbit closures for unipotent actions on homogeneous spaces. Geom. Funct. Anal. 4(2) (1994), 236257.Google Scholar
Reinhart, B. L.. Foliated manifolds with bundle-like metrics. Ann. of Math. (2) 69 (1959), 119132.Google Scholar
Samelson, H.. Notes on Lie Algebras, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
Verjovsky, A.. A uniformization theorem for holomorphic foliations. The Lefschetz Centennial Conference, Part III (Mexico City, 1984) (Contemporary Mathematics, 58). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1987, pp. 233253.Google Scholar
Winkelnkemper, H. E.. The graph of a foliation. Ann. Global Anal. Geom. 1(3) (1983), 5175.Google Scholar
Zimmer, R. J.. Ergodic Theory and Semisimple Groups (Monographs in Mathematics, 81). Birkhäuser, Basel, 1984.Google Scholar