Article contents
Robust transitivity for endomorphisms
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 August 2012
Abstract
We address the problem of the conditions under which an endomorphism having a dense orbit is such that a sufficiently close perturbed map also exhibits a dense orbit. For this purpose we give sufficient conditions, covering a large class of examples, for endomorphisms on the $n$-dimensional torus to be robustly transitive: the endomorphism must be volume expanding and any large connected arc must contain a point such that its future orbit belongs to an expanding region.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2012 Cambridge University Press
References
[BD96]Bonatti, C. and Díaz, L. J.. Persistent nonhyperbolic transitive diffeomorphisms. Ann. of Math. (2) 143(2) (1996), 357–396.Google Scholar
[BDP03]Bonatti, C., Díaz, L. J. and Pujals, E. R.. A $C^1$-generic dichotomy for diffeomorphisms: weak forms of hyperbolicity or infinitely many sinks or sources. Ann. of Math. (2) 158(2) (2003), 355–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[BV00]Bonatti, C. and Viana, M.. SRB measures for partially hyperbolic systems whose central direction is mostly contracting. Israel J. Math. 115 (2000), 157–193.Google Scholar
[Cas11]Castro, A.. New criteria for hyperbolicity based on periodic sets. Bull. Braz. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 42(3) (2011), 455–483.Google Scholar
[Cro02]Crovisier, S.. Une remarque sur les ensembles hyperboliques localement maximaux. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 334(5) (2002), 401–404.Google Scholar
[Fis06]Fisher, T.. Hyperbolic sets that are not locally maximal. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 26(5) (2006), 1491–1509.Google Scholar
[Fra71]Franks, J.. Necessary conditions for stability of diffeomorphisms. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 158 (1971), 301–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[KH95]Katok, A. and Hasselblatt, B.. Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems (Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 54). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995, with a supplementary chapter by Katok and Mendoza.Google Scholar
[Liu91]Liu, P. D.. The $R$-stability of $C^1$ self-mapping orbit spaces. Chinese Ann. Math. Ser. A 12(4) (1991), 415–421.Google Scholar
[Man78]Mañé, R.. Contributions to the stability conjecture. Topology 17(4) (1978), 383–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[NP10]Nassiri, M. and Pujals, E.. Robust transitivity in Hamiltonian dynamics. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. 45(2) (2010), 191–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[PS06]Pujals, E. R. and Sambarino, M.. A sufficient condition for robustly minimal foliations. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 26(01) (2006), 281–289.Google Scholar
[Rob76]Robinson, C.. Structural stability of $C^{1}$ diffeomorphisms. J. Differential Equations 22(1) (1976), 28–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Shu69]Shub, M.. Endomorphisms of compact differentiable manifolds. Amer. J. Math. 91(1) (1969), 175–199.Google Scholar
[Shu71]Shub, M.. Topologically transitive diffeomorphisms of $\mathbb {T}^4$. Symposium on Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 206). Springer, New York, 1971, pp. 39–40.Google Scholar
[Shu87]Shub, M.. Global Stability of Dynamical Systems. Springer, New York, 1987, with the collaboration of Albert Fathi and Rémi Langevin, Translated from the French by Joseph Christy.Google Scholar
- 7
- Cited by