Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T17:03:09.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Robust nonhyperbolic dynamics and heterodimensional cycles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Lorenzo J. Díaz
Affiliation:
Dto. Matemática, PUC-Rio, R. Marquês de S. Vicente 225, 22453 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Abstract

We describe an open set A of arcs of diffeomorphisms bifurcating through the creation of heterodimensional cycles for which every diffeomorphism after the bifurcation is nonhyperbolic or unstable. We also prove that generically in A the borning nonwandering set is transitive and local maximal for a full (Lebesgue) set of parameter values.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[BC]Benedicks, M. and Carleson, L.. The dynamics of the Hénon map. Ann. Math. 133 (1991), 73169.Google Scholar
[D]Díaz, L. J.. Bifurcacoes e ciclos heterodimensionais. Thesis IMPA, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1990.Google Scholar
[DR]Díaz, L. J. and Rocha, J.. Non-connected heterodimensional cycles: bifurcation and stability. Nonlinearity 5 (1992), 13151341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[HP]Hirsch, M. and Pugh, H.. Stable manifolds and hyperbolic sets. In Global Analysis. Proc. Symp. Pure Math. Vol. 14, Amer. Math. Soc: Rhode Island, 1970.Google Scholar
[MV]Mora, L. and Viana, M.. The abundance of strange attractors. Acta Math. 171 (1993), 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[N,1]Newhouse, S.. Nondensity of Axiom A(a) on S 2. In Global Analysis. Proc. Symp. Pure Math. Vol. 14, Amer. Math. Soc: Rhode Island, 1970.Google Scholar
[N,2]Newhouse, S.. Diffeomorphisms with infinitely many sinks. Topology 13 (1974), 918.Google Scholar
[N,3]Newhouse, S.. The abundance of wild hyperbolic sets and non smooth stable sets for diffeomorphisms. Publ. IHES 50 (1979), 101151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[NP,1]Newhouse, S. and Palis, J.. Hyperbolic nonwandering sets on two dimensional manifolds. In Dynamical Systems, Academic, New York, 1973.Google Scholar
[NP,2]Newhouse, S. and Palis, J.. Bifurcations of Morse—Smale dynamical systems. In Dynamical Systems, Academic, New York, 1973.Google Scholar
[NP,3]Newhouse, S. and Palis, J.. Cycles and bifurcation theory. Asterisque 31 (1978), 44140.Google Scholar
[P,1]Palis, J. and Takens, F.. A note on Ω-stability. In Global Analysis. Pwc. Symp. Pure Math. Vol. 14, Amer. Math. Soc: Rhode Island, 1970.Google Scholar
[P,2]Palis, J. and Takens, F.. On the C 1 Ω-stability conjecture. Publ. IHES 66 (1988), 211215.Google Scholar
[PT,1]Palis, J. and Takens, F.. Cycles and the measure of the bifurcation sets for two-dimensional diffeomorphisms. Invent. Math. 92 (1985), 397422.Google Scholar
[PT,2]Palis, J.. Hyperbolicity and the creation of homoclinic orbits. Ann. Math. 125 (1987), 337374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[PT,3]Palis, J.. The Theory of Homoclinic Bifurcations: Hyperbolicity, Fractional Dimensions and Infinitely Many Attractors. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1993.Google Scholar
[PY]Palis, J. and Yoccoz, J. C.. Homoclinic bifurcations: Large Hausdorff dimension and non-hyperbolic behaviour. Acta Math. 172 (1994), 91136.Google Scholar
[Sh]Shub, M.. Stabilité global des systemes dynamiques. Asterisque 56 (1978), 1211.Google Scholar
[St]Steinberg, S.. On the structure of local homeomorphisms of euclidean n-space II. 80 Amer. J. Math. (1958), 623631.Google Scholar
[T,1]Takens, F.. Partially hyperbolic fixed points. Topology 8 (1971), 133147.Google Scholar
[T,2]Takens, F.. Homoclinic bifurcations. Proc. Int. Conf. Math. Berkeley (1988), 1229–1236.Google Scholar
[YA]Yorke, J. and Alligood, K.. Cascades of period-doubling bifurcations: a prerequisite for horseshoes. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. (New Series) 9 (1983), 319322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar