Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:44:23.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Refined scales of weak-mixing dynamical systems: typical behaviour

Part of: Ergodic theory Spaces with richer structures Measure-theoretic ergodic theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2019

SILAS L. CARVALHO Open the ORCID record for SILAS L. CARVALHO [Opens in a new window]  and
CÉSAR R. DE OLIVEIRA Open the ORCID record for CÉSAR R. DE OLIVEIRA [Opens in a new window]
SILAS L. CARVALHO
Affiliation:
Departamento de Matemática, UFMG, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30161-970Brazil
CÉSAR R. DE OLIVEIRA
Affiliation:
Departamento de Matemática, UFSCar, São Carlos, SP, 13560-970Brazil
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study sets of measure-preserving transformations on Lebesgue spaces with continuous measures taking into account extreme scales of variations of weak mixing. It is shown that the generic dynamical behaviour depends on subsequences of time going to infinity. We also present corresponding generic sets of (probability) invariant measures with respect to topological shifts over finite alphabets and Axiom A diffeomorphisms over topologically mixing basic sets.

Keywords

scales of mixingKoopman operatorHalmos lemmaRohlin lemma

MSC classification

Primary: 37A25: Ergodicity, mixing, rates of mixing
Secondary: 28D05: Measure-preserving transformations 54E52: Baire category, Baire spaces
Type
Original Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 40 , Issue 12 , December 2020 , pp. 3296 - 3309
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alpern, S.. New proofs that weak mixing is generic. Invent. Math. 32 (1976), 263–279.Google Scholar
Barbaroux, J.-M., Combes, J.-M. and Montcho, R.. Remarks on the relation between quantum dynamics and fractal spectra. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 213 (1997), 698–722.Google Scholar
Barbaroux, J.-M., Germinet, F. and Tcheremchantsev, S.. Generalized fractal dimensions: equivalence and basic properties. J. Math. Pures Appl. 80 (2001), 977–1012.Google Scholar
Carvalho, S. L. and de Oliveira, C. R.. Correlation dimension wonderland theorems. J. Math. Phys. 57 (2016), 063501, 19 pp.Google Scholar
Damanik, D., Fillman, J. and Vance, R.. Dynamics of unitary operators. J. Fractal Geom. 1 (2014), 391–425.Google Scholar
del Junco, A. and Rosenblatt, J.. Counterexamples in ergodic theory and number theory. Math. Ann. 245 (1979), 185–197.Google Scholar
Halmos, P.. In general a measure preserving transformation is mixing. Ann. of Math. (2) 45 (1944), 786–792.Google Scholar
Halmos, P.. Lectures on Ergodic Theory. The Mathematical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1956.Google Scholar
Holschneider, M.. Fractal wavelet dimensions and localization. Comm. Math. Phys. 160 (1994), 457–473.Google Scholar
Kakutani, S. and Petersen, K.. The speed of convergence in the ergodic theorem. Monatsh. Math. 91 (1981), 11–18.Google Scholar
Knill, O.. Singular continuous spectrum and quantitative rates of weak mixing. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 4 (1998), 33–42.Google Scholar
Krengel, U.. On the speed of convergence in the ergodic theorem. Monatsh. Math. 86 (1978), 3–6.Google Scholar
Krieger, W.. On entropy and generators of measure-preserving transformations. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 149 (1970), 354–464. Erratum Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 168 (1972), 519.Google Scholar
Last, Y.. Quantum dynamics and decomposition of singular continuous spectra. J. Funct. Anal. 142 (2001), 406–445.Google Scholar
Rohlin, V.. A ‘general’ measure-preserving transformation is not mixing. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR (N.S.) 60 (1948), 349–351 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Rohlin, V.. Lectures on the entropy theory of transformations with invariant measure. Russian Math. Surveys 22 (1967), 1–52.Google Scholar
Walters, P.. An Introduction to Ergodic Theory. Springer, New York, 1982.Google Scholar