Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:40:45.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Real analytic Bernoulli geodesic flows on S2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Keith Burns  and
Marlies Gerber
Keith Burns
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
Marlies Gerber
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We obtain a family of metrics on the two-dimensional sphere whose geodesic flow is ergodic and Bernoulli. This family includes real analytic metrics.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 1989 , pp. 27 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

References

[BBB]Ballmann, W., Brin, M. & Burns, K.. On surfaces with no conjugate points. J. Diff. Geom. 25 (1987), 249–273.Google Scholar
[BGS]Ballmann, W., Gromov, M. & Schroeder, V.. Manifolds of Nonpositive Curvature. Progress in Mathematics 61, Birkhäuser: 1985.Google Scholar
[B]Bochner, S.. Analytic mapping of compact Riemann spaces into Euclidean space. Duke Math. J. 3 (1937), 339–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Bu]Bunimovich, L. A.. Personal communication.Google Scholar
[BG]Burns, K. & Gerber, M.. Continuous invariant cone families and ergodicity of flows in dimension three. Preprint. 1987, To appear in Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys.Google Scholar
[C]Cartan, H.. Variétés analytiques réelles et variétés analytiques complexes. Bull. Soc. Math. France 85 (1957), 77–99.Google Scholar
[CE]Cheeger, J. & Ebin, D.. Comparison Theorems in Riemannian Geometry. North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1975.Google Scholar
[D1]Donnay, V. J.. Geodesic flow on S2 with positive measure entropy. Preprint, 1986.Google Scholar
[D2]Donnay, V. J.. Geodesic flow on the two sphere with positive entropy. Ph.D. Thesis, New York University, 1986.Google Scholar
[D3]Donnay, V. J.. Geodesic flow on the two-sphere, Part I: Positive measure entropy. Preprint, 1987.Google Scholar
[D4]Donnay, V. J.. Geodesic flow on the two-sphere, Part II: Ergodicity. Preprint, 1987.Google Scholar
[FLP]Fathi, A., Laudenbach, F. & Poénaru, V.. Travaux de Thurston sur les Surfaces. Astérisque 66–67, Soc. Math. France: Paris, 1979.Google Scholar
[Ka]Katok, A.. Invariant cone families and stochastic properties of smooth dynamical systems. Preprint, 1987.Google Scholar
[K1]Klingenberg, W.. Riemannian Geometry. De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, 1982.Google Scholar
[Ma1]Malgrange, B.. Ideals of Differentiable Functions. Oxford University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
[M]Manning, A.. More topological entropy for geodesic flows. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 898, pp. 243–249. Springer: New York, 1980.Google Scholar
[O]Osserman, R.. Talk at Cal. Tech., 1985.Google Scholar
[We]Wells, R.O.. Differential Analysis on Complex Manifolds. Springer: New York, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[W]Wojtkowski, M.. Invariant families of cones and Lyapunov exponents. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 5 (1985), 145–161.Google Scholar