Hostname: page-component-669899f699-qzcqf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T00:38:03.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Patterson–Sullivan theory for groups with a strongly contracting element

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2024

RÉMI COULON*
Affiliation:
Université de Bourgogne, CNRS, IMB - UMR 5584, F-21000 Dijon, France

Abstract

Using Patterson–Sullivan measures, we investigate growth problems for groups acting on a metric space with a strongly contracting element.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arzhantseva, G., Cashen, C. H. and Tao, J.. Growth tight actions. Pacific J. Math. 278(1) (2015), 149.10.2140/pjm.2015.278.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arzhantseva, G. N. and Cashen, C. H.. Cogrowth for group actions with strongly contracting elements. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 40(7) (2020), 17381754.10.1017/etds.2018.123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bader, U.. Commensurated subgroups of a free group, May 2018. Available from: https://mathoverflow.net/questions/299348.Google Scholar
Bader, U. and Furman, A.. Some ergodic properties of metrics on hyperbolic groups. Preprint, 2017, arXiv:1707.02020.Google Scholar
Bestvina, M., Bromberg, K. and Fujiwara, K.. Constructing group actions on quasi-trees and applications to mapping class groups. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 122 (2015), 164.10.1007/s10240-014-0067-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bestvina, M. and Fujiwara, K.. A characterization of higher rank symmetric spaces via bounded cohomology. Geom. Funct. Anal. 19(1) (2009), 1140.10.1007/s00039-009-0717-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridson, M. R. and Haefliger, A.. Metric Spaces of Non-Positive Curvature (Grundlehren Der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], 319). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999.10.1007/978-3-662-12494-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, R.. The fundamental group and the spectrum of the Laplacian. Comment. Math. Helv. 56(4) (1981), 581598.10.1007/BF02566228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, M. and Mozes, S.. CAT(-1)-spaces, divergence groups and their commensurators. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 9(1) (1996), 5793.10.1090/S0894-0347-96-00196-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champetier, C.. Cocroissance des groupes à petite simplification. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 25(5) (1993), 438444.10.1112/blms/25.5.438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, R. and Sultan, H.. Contracting boundaries of CAT(0) spaces. J. Topol. 8(1) (2015), 93117.10.1112/jtopol/jtu017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. M.. Cogrowth and amenability of discrete groups. J. Funct. Anal. 48(3) (1982), 301309.10.1016/0022-1236(82)90090-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coornaert, M.. Mesures de Patterson–Sullivan sur le bord d’un espace hyperbolique au sens de Gromov. Pacific J. Math. 159(2) (1993), 241270.10.2140/pjm.1993.159.241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coornaert, M. and Papadopoulos, A.. Horofunctions and symbolic dynamics on Gromov hyperbolic groups. Glasg. Math. J. 43(3) (2001), 425456.10.1017/S0017089501030063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordes, M.. Morse boundaries of proper geodesic metric spaces. Groups Geom. Dyn. 11(4) (2017), 12811306.10.4171/ggd/429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulon, R.. Growth of periodic quotients of hyperbolic groups. Algebr. Geom. Topol. 13(6) (2013), 31113133.10.2140/agt.2013.13.3111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulon, R.. Ergodicity of the geodesic flow for groups with a contracting element. Preprint, 2023, arXiv:2303.01390.Google Scholar
Coulon, R., Dal’Bo, F. and Sambusetti, A.. Growth gap in hyperbolic groups and amenability. Geom. Funct. Anal. 28(5) (2018), 12601320.10.1007/s00039-018-0459-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulon, R., Dougall, R., Schapira, B. and Tapie, S.. Twisted Patterson–Sullivan measures and applications to amenability and coverings. Preprint, 2018, arXiv:1809.10881, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., to appear.Google Scholar
Dahmani, F., Futer, D. and Wise, D. T.. Growth of quasiconvex subgroups. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 167(3) (2019), 505530.10.1017/S0305004118000440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskin, A., Mirzakhani, M. and Rafi, K.. Counting closed geodesics in strata. Invent. Math. 215(2) (2019), 535607.10.1007/s00222-018-0832-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eymard, P.. Moyennes invariantes et représentations unitaires (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 300). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1972.10.1007/BFb0060750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerasimov, V. and Potyagailo, L.. Quasiconvexity in relatively hyperbolic groups. J. Reine Angew. Math. 710 (2016), 95135.10.1515/crelle-2015-0029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigorchuk, R. I.. Symmetric random walks on discrete groups. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 32(6(198)) (1977), 217218.Google Scholar
Grigorchuk, R. I.. Symmetrical random walks on discrete groups. Multicomponent Random Systems. Eds. Dobrushin, R. L., Sinai, Ya. G. and Griffeath, D.. Dekker, New York, 1980, pp. 285325.Google Scholar
Gromov, M.. Hyperbolic groups. Essays in Group Theory. Ed. Gersten, S. M.. Springer, New York, NY, 1987, pp. 75263.10.1007/978-1-4613-9586-7_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurevich, B. M. and Savchenko, S. V.. Thermodynamic formalism for symbolic Markov chains with a countable number of states. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 53(2(320)) (1998), 3106.Google Scholar
Jaerisch, J. and Matsuzaki, K.. Growth and cogrowth of normal subgroups of a free group. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 145(10) (2017), 41414149.10.1090/proc/13568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knieper, G.. On the asymptotic geometry of nonpositively curved manifolds. Geom. Funct. Anal. 7(4) (1997), 755782.10.1007/s000390050025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knieper, G.. The uniqueness of the measure of maximal entropy for geodesic flows on rank 1 manifolds. Ann. of Math. (2) 148(1) (1998), 291314.10.2307/120995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochen, S. and Stone, C.. A note on the Borel–Cantelli lemma. Illinois J. Math. 8 (1964), 248251.10.1215/ijm/1256059668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J. and Wise, D. T.. No growth-gaps for special cube complexes. Groups Geom. Dyn. 14(1) (2020), 117135.10.4171/ggd/537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Link, G.. Hopf–Tsuji–Sullivan dichotomy for quotients of Hadamard spaces with a rank one isometry. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 38(11) (2018), 55775613.10.3934/dcds.2018245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margulis, G. A.. Certain applications of ergodic theory to the investigation of manifolds of negative curvature. Funkcional. Anal. i Prilozen. 3(4) (1969), 8990.Google Scholar
Matsuzaki, K. and Yabuki, Y.. The Patterson–Sullivan measure and proper conjugation for Kleinian groups of divergence type. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 29(2) (2009), 657665.10.1017/S0143385708080267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuzaki, K., Yabuki, Y. and Jaerisch, J.. Normalizer, divergence type, and Patterson measure for discrete groups of the Gromov hyperbolic space. Groups Geom. Dyn. 14(2) (2020), 369411.10.4171/ggd/548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minsky, Y. N.. Quasi-projections in Teichmüller space. J. Reine Angew. Math. 473 (1996), 121136.Google Scholar
Murray, D.. Topology and dynamics of the contracting boundary of cocompact $CAT(0)$ spaces. Pacific J. Math. 299(1) (2019), 89116.10.2140/pjm.2019.299.89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, S. J.. The limit set of a Fuchsian group. Acta Math. 136(3–4) (1976), 241273.10.1007/BF02392046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qing, Y. and Rafi, K.. Sublinearly Morse boundary I: CAT(0) spaces. Adv. Math. 404 (2022), Paper no. 108442, 51pp.10.1016/j.aim.2022.108442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qing, Y., Rafi, K. and Tiozzo, G.. Sublinearly Morse boundary II: Proper geodesic spaces. Preprint, 2020, arXiv:2011.03481.Google Scholar
Roblin, T.. Un Théorème de Fatou Pour les Densités Conformes Avec Applications Aux Revêtements Galoisiens en Courbure Négative. Israel J. Math. 147(1) (2005), 333357.10.1007/BF02785371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarig, O. M.. Thermodynamic formalism for null recurrent potentials. Israel J. Math. 121 (2001), 285311.10.1007/BF02802508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schapira, B. and Tapie, S.. Regularity of entropy, geodesic currents and entropy at infinity. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 54(1) (2021), 168.10.24033/asens.2455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukhov, A. G.. On the dependence of the growth exponent on the length of the defining relation. Mat. Zametki 65(4) (1999), 612618.Google Scholar
Sisto, A.. On metric relative hyperbolicity. Preprint, 2012, arXiv:1210.8081.Google Scholar
Sisto, A.. Contracting elements and random walks. J. Reine Angew. Math. 742 (2018), 79114.10.1515/crelle-2015-0093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, D.. Related aspects of positivity in Riemannian geometry. J. Differential Geom. 25(3) (1987), 327351.10.4310/jdg/1214440979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, W.. Growth tightness for groups with contracting elements. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 157(2) (2014), 297319.10.1017/S0305004114000322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, W.. Statistically convex-cocompact actions of groups with contracting elements. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2019(23) (2019), 72597323.10.1093/imrn/rny001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, W.. Genericity of contracting elements in groups. Math. Ann. 376(3–4) (2020), 823861.10.1007/s00208-018-1758-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, W.. Conformal dynamics at infinity for groups with contracting elements. Preprint, 2023, arXiv:2208.04861.Google Scholar