No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Minimality and ergodicity of a generic analytic foliation of ℂ2
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 October 2008
Abstract
It is well known that a generic polynomial foliation of ℂ2 is minimal and ergodic. In this paper we prove an analogous result for analytic foliations.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press
References
[1]Chaperon, M.. Generic complex flows. Complex Geometry II: Contemporary Aspects of Mathematics and Physics. Hermann, Paris, 2004, pp. 71–79.Google Scholar
[2]Fedorov, R. M.. Lower bounds for the number of orbital topological types of planar polynomial vector fields modulo limit cycles. Mosc. Math. J. 1(4) (2001), 539–550. Dedicated to the memory of I. G. Petrovskii on the occasion of his 100th anniversary.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Firsova, T. S.. Topology of analytic foliations in ℂ2. The Kupka-Smale property. Tr. Mat. Inst. Steklova 254 (2006), 162–180; Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 254 (2006), 169–179.Google Scholar
[4]Golenishcheva-Kutuzova, T. I.. A generic analytic foliation in ℂ2 has infinitely many cylindrical leaves. Tr. Mat. Inst. Steklova 254 (2006), 192–195. Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 254 (2006), 180–183.Google Scholar
[5]Hutchinson, J.. Fractals and self-similarity. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 30(5) (1981), 713–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Ilyashenko, Yu.. Centennial history of Hilbert 16th problem. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 39(3) (2002), 301–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Ilyashenko, Yu. S.. Foliations by analytic curves. Mat. Sb. 88(130) (1972), 558–577.Google Scholar
[8]Ilyashenko, Yu.. The density of an individual solution and the ergodicity of the family of solutions of the equation dη/dξ=P(ξ,η)/Q(ξ,η). Mat. Zametki 4 (1968), 741–750 (Engl. transl. Math. Notes 4 (6) (1968), 934–938).Google Scholar
[9]Ilyashenko, Yu.. Topology of phase portraits of analytic differential equations on a complex projective plane. Trudy Sem. Petrovsk. 4 (1978), 83–136 (Engl. transl. Selecta Math. Sov. 5 (1986), 141–199).Google Scholar
[10]Itenberg, I. and Shustin, E.. Singular points and limit cycles of planar polynomial vector fields. Duke Math. J. 102(1) (2000), 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Khudai-Verenov, M. G.. A property of the solutions of a differential equation. Mat. Sb. 56 (1962), 301–308 (in Russian).Google Scholar
[12]Loray, F. and Rebelo, J.. Minimal, rigid foliations by curves on ℂP n. J. Eur. Math. Soc. 5 (2003), 147–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Nakai, I.. Separatrices for nonsolvable dynamics on ℂ,0. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 44(2) (1994), 569–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Navas, A.. Sur les groupes de difféomorphismes du cercle. Enseign. Math. 50 (2004), 29–68.Google Scholar
[15]Shcherbakov, A. A.. Dynamics of local groups of conformal mappings and generic properties of differential equations on ℂ2. Tr. Mat. Inst. Steklova 254 (2006); Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 254 (2006), 103–120.Google Scholar
[16]Shub, M. and Sullivan, D.. Expanding endomorphisms of the circle revisited. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 5(2) (1985), 285–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Sullivan, D.. Conformal Dynamical Systems (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1007). Springer, Berlin, 1983, pp. 725–752.Google Scholar
[18]Viro, O.. Gluing of plane real algebraic curves and constructions of curves of degrees 6 and 7. Topology (Leningrad, 1982) (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1060). Springer, Berlin, 1984, pp. 187–200.Google Scholar