Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:50:59.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mean equicontinuity and mean sensitivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2014

JIAN LI Open the ORCID record for JIAN LI [Opens in a new window] ,
SIMING TU  and
XIANGDONG YE
JIAN LI
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Shantou University, Shantou, Guangdong 515063,PR China email [email protected]
SIMING TU
Affiliation:
Wu Wen-Tsun Key Laboratory of Mathematics, USTC, Chinese Academy of Sciences and School of Mathematics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, PR China email [email protected], [email protected]
XIANGDONG YE
Affiliation:
Wu Wen-Tsun Key Laboratory of Mathematics, USTC, Chinese Academy of Sciences and School of Mathematics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, PR China email [email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Answering an open question affirmatively it is shown that every ergodic invariant measure of a mean equicontinuous (i.e. mean-L-stable) system has discrete spectrum. Dichotomy results related to mean equicontinuity and mean sensitivity are obtained when a dynamical system is transitive or minimal. Localizing the notion of mean equicontinuity, notions of almost mean equicontinuity and almost Banach mean equicontinuity are introduced. It turns out that a system with the former property may have positive entropy and meanwhile a system with the latter property must have zero entropy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 35 , Issue 8 , December 2015 , pp. 2587 - 2612
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akin, E., Auslander, J. and Berg, K.. When is a transitive map chaotic? Convergence in Ergodic Theory and Probability (Columbus, OH, 1993) (Ohio State University Mathematics Research Institute Publication, 5). de Gruyter, Berlin, 1996, pp. 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auslander, J.. Mean-L-stable systems. Illinois J. Math. 3 (1959), 566–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auslander, J.. Minimal Flows and Their Extensions. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1988.Google Scholar
Auslander, J. and Yorke, J. A.. Interval maps, factors of maps, and chaos. Tohoku Math. J. 32(2) (1980), 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, F.. A disjointness theorem involving topological entropy. Bull. Soc. Math. France 121 (1993), 465–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downarowicz, T.. Positive topological entropy implies chaos DC2. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 142 (2014), 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. and Gottschalk, W. H.. Homomorphisms of transformation groups. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 94 (1960), 258–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fomin, S.. On dynamical systems with a purely point spectrum. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 77 (1951), 29–32 ; In Russian.Google Scholar
Furstenberg, H.. Recurrence in Ergodic Theory and Combinatorial Number Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Ramos, F.. Weak forms of topological and measure theoretical equicontinuity: relationships with discrete spectrum and sequence entropy. Preprint, 2010, arXiv:1402.7327V2 [MATH.DS].Google Scholar
Gillis, J.. Notes on a property of measurable sets. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 11 (1936), 139–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasner, E.. The structure of tame minimal dynamical systems. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 27 (2007), 1819–1837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasner, S. and Maon, D.. Rigidity in topological dynamics. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 9 (1989), 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasner, E., Megrelishvili, M. and Uspenskij, V.. On metrizable enveloping semigroups. Israel J. Math. 164 (2008), 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasner, E. and Weiss, B.. Sensitive dependence on initial conditions. Nonlinearity 6(6) (1993), 1067–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, F. and Katznelson, Y.. On the entropy of uniquely ergodic transformations. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 126 (1967), 335–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, W., Li, S., Shao, S. and Ye, X.. Null systems and sequence entropy pairs. Ergod Th. & Dynam. Sys. 23 (2003), 1505–1523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, W., Li, J. and Ye, X.. Stable sets and mean Li–York chaos in positive entropy systems. J. Funct. Anal. 266 (2014), 3377–3394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, W., Lu, P. and Ye, X.. Measure-theoretical sensitivity and equicontinuity. Israel J. Math. 183 (2011), 233–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, W. and Ye, X.. Devaney’s chaos or 2-scattering implies Li–Yorke’s chaos. Topology Appl. 117 (2002), 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, W. and Ye, X.. Minimal sets in almost equicontinuous systems. Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 244 (2004), 280–287.Google Scholar
Huang, W. and Ye, X.. A local variational relation and applications. Israel J. Math. 151 (2006), 237–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, D. and Li, H.. Independence in topological and C∗ -dynamics. Math. Ann. 338 (2007), 869–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J. and Tu, S.. On proximality with Banach density one. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 416 (2014), 36–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ornstein, D. and Weiss, B.. Mean distality and tightness. Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 244(1) (2004), 295–302.Google Scholar
Oxtoby, J. C.. Ergodic sets. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 58 (1952), 116–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarpellini, B.. Stability properties of flows with pure point spectrum. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 26(3) (1982), 451–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, P.. An Introduction to Ergodic Theory (Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 79). Springer, New York-Berlin, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ye, X. and Zhang, R.. On sensitivity sets in topological dynamics. Nonlinearity 21 (2008), 1601–1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar