Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T18:00:09.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maximizing measures for partially hyperbolic systems with compact center leaves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

F. RODRIGUEZ HERTZ ,
M. A. RODRIGUEZ HERTZ ,
A. TAHZIBI  and
R. URES
F. RODRIGUEZ HERTZ
Affiliation:
IMERL-Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de la República, CC 30 Montevideo, Uruguay (email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected])
M. A. RODRIGUEZ HERTZ
Affiliation:
IMERL-Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de la República, CC 30 Montevideo, Uruguay (email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected])
A. TAHZIBI
Affiliation:
Departamento de Matemática, ICMC-USP São Carlos, Caixa Postal 668, 13560-970 São, Carlos-SP, Brazil (email: [email protected])
R. URES
Affiliation:
IMERL-Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de la República, CC 30 Montevideo, Uruguay (email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We obtain the following dichotomy for accessible partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms of three-dimensional manifolds having compact center leaves: either there is a unique entropy-maximizing measure, this measure has the Bernoulli property and its center Lyapunov exponent is 0, or there are a finite number of entropy-maximizing measures, all of them with non-zero center Lyapunov exponents (at least one with a negative exponent and one with a positive exponent), that are finite extensions of a Bernoulli system. In the first case of the dichotomy, we obtain that the system is topologically conjugated to a rotation extension of a hyperbolic system. This implies that the second case of the dichotomy holds for an open and dense set of diffeomorphisms in the hypothesis of our result. As a consequence, we obtain an open set of topologically mixing diffeomorphisms having more than one entropy-maximizing measure.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 32 , Issue 2: Daniel J. Rudolph – in Memoriam , April 2012 , pp. 825 - 839
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Avila, A. and Viana, M.. Extremal Lyapunov exponents: an invariance principle and applications. Invent. Math. 181 (2010), 115–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Avila, A., Viana, M. and Wilkinson, A.. Absolute continuity, Lyapunov exponents, and rigidity. Preprint.Google Scholar
[3]Bonatti, C. and Díaz, L. J.. Persistent nonhyperbolic transitive diffeomorphisms. Ann. of Math. (2) 143(2) (1996), 357–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Bowen, R.. Markov partitions for Axiom A diffeomorphisms. Amer. J. Math. 92 (1970), 725–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Brin, M., Burago, D. and Ivanov, S.. Dynamical coherence of partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms of the 3-torus. J. Mod. Dyn. 3 (2009), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Burns, K., Rodriguez Hertz, F., Rodriguez Hertz, M. A., Talitskaya, A. and Ures, R.. Density of accessibility for partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms with one-dimensional center. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 22(1–2) (2008), 75–88.Google Scholar
[7]Buzzi, J., Fisher, T., Sambarino, M. and Vasquez, C.. Maximal entropy measures for certain partially hyperbolic, derived from Anosov systems. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. to appear.Google Scholar
[8]Carrasco, P.. Compact dynamical foliations. PhD Thesis, University of Toronto, 2010.Google Scholar
[9]Cowieson, W. and Young, L.-S.. SRB measures as zero-noise limits. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 25(4) (2005), 1115–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Díaz, L. J. and Fisher, T.. Symbolic extensions for partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 29 (2011), 1419–1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Didier, P.. Stability of accessibility. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 23(6) (2003), 1717–1731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Dolgopyat, D.. On mixing properties of compact group extensions of hyperbolic systems. Israel J. Math. 130 (2002), 157–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Epstein, D. B. A.. Periodic flow on three-manifolds. Ann. of Math. (2) 95(1) (1972), 66–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Franks, J.. Anosov diffeomorphisms. Global Analysis (Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, XIV, Berkeley, CA, 1968). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1970, pp. 61–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Hatcher, A.. Notes on basic 3-manifold topology. Hatcher’s webpage at Cornell Math. Dep. http://www.math.cornell.edu/∼hatcher/3M/3M.pdf.Google Scholar
[16]Hammerlindl, A.. Leaf conjugacies of the torus. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. to appear and PhD Thesis, University of Toronto, 2009.Google Scholar
[17]Hua, Y., Saghin, R. and Xia, Z.. Topological entropy and partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 28(3) (2008), 843–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Ledrappier, F. and Walters, P.. A relativised variational principle for continuous transformations. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 16(3) (1977), 568–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Mañé, R.. Contributions to the stability conjecture. Topology 17 (1978), 383–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Margulis, G.. On Some Aspects of the Theory of Anosov Systems (Springer Monographs in Mathematics, VII). Springer, New York, 2004, with a survey by Richard Sharp: periodic orbits of hyperbolic flows.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Misiurewicz, M.. Diffeomorphism without any measure with maximal entropy. Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci., Sér. Sci. Math., Astr. et Phys. 21 (1973), 903–910.Google Scholar
[22]Nassiri, M. and Pujals, E.. Robust transitivity in Hamiltonian dynamics. Ann. Sci. ENS to appear.Google Scholar
[23]Newhouse, S.. Continuity properties of entropy. Ann. of Math. (2) 129 (1989), 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Newhouse, S. and Young, L. S.. Dynamics of certain skew products. Geometric Dynamics (Rio de Janeiro, 1981) (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1007). Springer, Berlin, 1983, pp. 611–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Niţică, V. and Török, A.. An open dense set of stably ergodic diffeomorphisms in a neighborhood of a non-ergodic one. Topology 40 (2001), 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26]Parwani, K.. On 3-manifolds that support partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms. Nonlinearity 23(3) (2010), 589–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27]Rodriguez Hertz, F., Rodriguez Hertz, M. and Ures, R.. Partial hyperbolicity and ergodicity in dimension three. J. Mod. Dyn. 2 (2008), 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[28]Rodriguez Hertz, F., Rodriguez Hertz, M. A. and Ures, R.. A non-dynamical coherent example in 𝕋3. in preparation.Google Scholar
[29]Rudolph, D. J.. Classifying the isometric extensions of a Bernoulli shift. J. Anal. Math. 34 (1978), 36–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[30]Ruelle, D. and Wilkinson, A.. Absolutely singular dynamical foliations. Comm. Math. Phys. 219 (2001), 481–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[31]Shub, M.. Topologically transitive diffeomorphisms on 𝕋4. Lecture Notes on Math. 206 (1971), 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[32]Steenrod, N.. The Topology of Fibre Bundles (Princeton Mathematical Series, 14). Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[33]Nassiri, M. and Tahzibi, A.. Ergodic properties of partially hyperbolic sets. in preparation.Google Scholar
[34]Ures, R.. Intrinsic ergodicity of partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms with hyperbolic linear part. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. to appear.Google Scholar
[35]Weiss, B.. Intrinsically ergodic systems. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 76 (1970), 1266–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar