Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:08:36.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hölder continuity of Oseledets splittings for semi-invertible operator cocycles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2016

DAVOR DRAGIČEVIĆ  and
GARY FROYLAND
DAVOR DRAGIČEVIĆ
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia email [email protected], [email protected]
GARY FROYLAND
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia email [email protected], [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

For Hölder continuous cocycles over an invertible, Lipschitz base, we establish the Hölder continuity of Oseledets subspaces on compact sets of arbitrarily large measure. This extends a result of Araújo et al [On Hölder-continuity of Oseledets subspaces J. Lond. Math. Soc.93 (2016) 194–218] by considering possibly non-invertible cocycles, which, in addition, may take values in the space of compact operators on a Hilbert space. As a by-product of our work, we also show that a non-invertible cocycle with non-vanishing Lyapunov exponents exhibits non-uniformly hyperbolic behaviour (in the sense of Pesin) on a set of full measure.

Type
Original Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , May 2018 , pp. 961 - 981
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2016 

References

Akhiezer, N. and Glazman, I.. Theory of Linear Operators in Hilbert Space. Dover, New York, 1993.Google Scholar
Araújo, V., Bufetov, A. I. and Filip, S.. On Hölder-continuity of Oseledets subspaces. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 93 (2016), 194–218.Google Scholar
Arnold, L.. Random Dynamical Systems (Springer Monographs in Mathematics) . Springer, Berlin, 1998.Google Scholar
Baladi, V.. Positive Transfer Operators and Decay of Correlations, Vol. 16. World Scientific, Singapore, 2000.Google Scholar
Barreira, L. and Pesin, Y.. Nonuniform Hyperbolicity (Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 115) . Cambridge University Press, New York, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barreira, L., Pesin, Y. and Schmeling, J.. Dimension and product structure of hyperbolic measures. Ann. of Math. (2) 149(3) (1999), 755–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barreira, L. and Valls, C.. Noninvertible cocycles: robustness of exponential dichotomies. Disc. Contin. Dynam. Syst. 32(12) (2012), 4111–4131.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, A. and Young, L. S.. Entropy, volume growth and SRB measures for Banach space mappings. Preprint, 2015, http://arxiv.org/pdf/1510.04312.pdf.Google Scholar
Brin, M.. Hölder Continuity of Invariant Distributions (Smooth Ergodic Theory and its Applications) . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2001, pp. 91–93.Google Scholar
Cogburn, R.. The ergodic theory of Markov chains in random environments. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeit 66(1) (1984), 109–128.Google Scholar
Froyland, G. and González-Tokman, C.. Stability and approximation of invariant measures of Markov chains in random environments. Stoch. Dyn. 16(01) (2016), 1650003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froyland, G., Lloyd, S. and Quas, A.. Coherent structures and isolated spectrum for Perron–Frobenius cocycles. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 30(3) (2010), 729–756.Google Scholar
Froyland, G., Lloyd, S. and Quas, A.. A semi-invertible Oseledets theorem with applications to transfer operator cocycles. Discr. Contin. Dynam. Syst. 33(9) (2013), 3835–3860.Google Scholar
Froyland, G., Lloyd, S. and Santitissadeekorn, N.. Coherent sets for nonautonomous dynamical systems. Physica D 239(16) (2010), 1527–1541.Google Scholar
González-Tokman, C. and Quas, A.. A semi-invertible operator Oseledets theorem. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 34(5) (2014), 1230–1272.Google Scholar
González-Tokman, C. and Quas, A.. A concise proof of the Multiplicative Ergodic Theorem on Banach spaces. J. Mod. Dyn. 9 (2015), 237–255.Google Scholar
Katok, A.. Lyapunov exponents, entropy and periodic orbits for diffeomorphisms. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 51 (1980.), 137–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lian, Z. and Lu, K.. Lyapunov Exponents and Invariant Manifolds for Random Dynamical Systems in a Banach Space (Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, 206) . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010.Google Scholar
Mañé, R.. Lyapounov exponents and stable manifolds for compact transformations. Geometric Dynamics (Rio de Janeiro, 1981) (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1007) . Springer, Berlin, 1983.Google Scholar
Oseledets, V. I.. A multiplicative ergodic theorem. Characteristic Lyapunov, exponents of dynamical systems. Tr. Mosk. Mat. Obs. 19 (1968), 179–210.Google Scholar
Pesin, Y. B.. Characteristic Lyapunov exponents and smooth ergodic theory. Russian Math. Surveys 32 (1977), 55–114.Google Scholar
Ruelle, D.. Characteristic exponents and invariant manifolds in Hilbert space. Ann. of Math. (2) (1982), 243–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thieullen, P.. Fibres dynamiques asymptotiquement compacts exposants de Lyapounov. Entropie. Dimension. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré C 4(1) (1987), 49–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar