No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Groups with infinite FC-center have the Schmidt property
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 March 2021
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
We show that every countable group with infinite finite conjugacy (FC)-center has the Schmidt property, that is, admits a free, ergodic, measure-preserving action on a standard probability space such that the full group of the associated orbit equivalence relation contains a non-trivial central sequence. As a consequence, every countable, inner amenable group with property (T) has the Schmidt property.
MSC classification
- Type
- Original Article
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Bédos, E. and de la Harpe, P.. Moyennabilité intérieure des groupes: définitions et exemples. Enseign. Math. (2) 32 (1986), 139–157.Google Scholar
Bekka, B., de la Harpe, P. and Valette, A.. Kazhdan’s Property (T) (New Mathematical Monographs, 11). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, L. and Tucker-Drob, R.. The space of stable weak equivalence classes of measure-preserving actions. J. Funct. Anal. 274 (2018), 3170–3196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Cornulier, Y.. Finitely presentable, non-Hopfian groups with Kazhdan’s property (T) and infinite outer automorphism group. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 135 (2007), 951–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deprez, T. and Vaes, S.. Inner amenability, property Gamma, McDuff
${\text{II}}_1$
factors and stable equivalence relations. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 38 (2018), 2618–2624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
${\text{II}}_1$
factors and stable equivalence relations. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 38 (2018), 2618–2624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarEffros, E. G.. Property
$\varGamma$
and inner amenability. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 47 (1975), 483–486.Google Scholar
$\varGamma$
and inner amenability. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 47 (1975), 483–486.Google ScholarErshov, M.. Kazhdan groups whose FC-radical is not virtually abelian. J. Comb. Algebra 1 (2017), 59–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ershov, M. and Jaikin-Zapirain, A.. Property (
$T$
) for noncommutative universal lattices, Invent. Math. 179 (2010), 303–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$T$
) for noncommutative universal lattices, Invent. Math. 179 (2010), 303–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarFolland, G. B.. A Course in Abstract Harmonic Analysis (Textbooks in Mathematics), 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, P.. The regular representations of measure groupoids. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 242 (1978),35–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Y.. A remark on
$\mathbb{T}$
-valued cohomology groups of algebraic group actions. J. Funct. Anal. 271 (2016), 577–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$\mathbb{T}$
-valued cohomology groups of algebraic group actions. J. Funct. Anal. 271 (2016), 577–592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarJones, V. F. R. and Schmidt, K.. Asymptotically invariant sequences and approximate finiteness. Amer. J. Math. 109 (1987), 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassabov, M.. Universal lattices and unbounded rank expanders. Invent. Math. 170 (2007), 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kechris, A. S.. Classical Descriptive Set Theory (Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 156). Springer, New York, NY, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kechris, A. S.. Global Aspects of Ergodic Group Actions (Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 160). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kida, Y.. Inner amenable groups having no stable action. Geom. Dedicata 173 (2014), 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kida, Y.. Stability in orbit equivalence for Baumslag–Solitar groups and Vaes groups. Groups Geom. Dyn. 9 (2015), 203–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kida, Y.. Stable actions of central extensions and relative property (T). Israel J. Math. 207 (2015), 925–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kida, Y.. Stable actions and central extensions, Math. Ann. 369 (2017), 705–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kida, Y. and Tucker-Drob, R.. Inner amenable groupoids and central sequences. Forum Math. Sigma 8 (2020), e29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mimura, M.. Superintrinsic synthesis in fixed point properties. Preprint, 2016, arXiv:1505.06728v2.Google Scholar
Popa, S. and Vaes, S.. On the fundamental group of
${\textsf{II}}_1$
factors and equivalence relations arising from group actions. Quanta of Maths (Clay Mathematics Proceedings, 11). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010, pp. 519–541.Google Scholar
${\textsf{II}}_1$
factors and equivalence relations arising from group actions. Quanta of Maths (Clay Mathematics Proceedings, 11). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010, pp. 519–541.Google ScholarSchmidt, K.. Some solved and unsolved problems concerning orbit equivalence of countable group actions. Proceedings of the Conference on Ergodic Theory and Related Topics, II (Georgenthal, 1986) (Teubner-Texte zur Mathematik, 94). Teubner, Leipzig, 1987.Google Scholar
Series, C.. An application of groupoid cohomology. Pacific J. Math. 92 (1981), 415–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suslin, A. A.. The structure of the special linear group over rings of polynomials. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 41 (1977), 235–252 (in Russian); translated in Math. USSR-Izv. 11 (1977), 221–238.Google Scholar
Tucker-Drob, R. D.. Invariant means and the structure of inner amenable groups. Duke Math. J. 169 (2020), 2571–2628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaes, S.. An inner amenable group whose von Neumann algebra does not have property Gamma. Acta Math. 208 (2012), 389–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access
Open access