Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:30:02.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Entropy for expansive algebraic actions of residually finite groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2010

LEWIS BOWEN
LEWIS BOWEN*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Texas A&M University, Mailstop 3368, College Station, TX 77843-3368, USA (email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We prove a formula for the sofic entropy of expansive principal algebraic actions of residually finite groups, extending recent work of Deninger and Schmidt.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , June 2011 , pp. 703 - 718
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Abert, M. and Weiss, B.. Bernoulli actions are weakly contained in any free action. In preparation.Google Scholar
[2]Bowen, L.. A measure-conjugacy invariant for actions of free groups. Ann. of Math. (2) to appear.Google Scholar
[3]Bowen, L.. The ergodic theory of free group actions: entropy and the f-invariant. Groups, Geometry and Dynamics, arXiv:0902.0174, to appear.Google Scholar
[4]Bowen, L.. Measure conjugacy invariants for actions of countable sofic groups. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 23 (2010), 217–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Deninger, C.. Fuglede–Kadison determinants and entropy for actions of discrete amenable groups. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 19 (2006), 737–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Deninger, C. and Schmidt, K.. Expansive algebraic actions of discrete residually finite amenable groups and their entropy. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 27 (2007), 769–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Fuglede, B. and Kadison, R. V.. Determinant theory in finite factors. Ann. of Math. (2) 55 (1952), 520–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Kechris, A. S.. Global Aspects of Ergodic Group Actions (Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 160). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Kechris, A. S. and Tsankov, T.. Amenable actions and almost invariant sets. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 136(2) (2008), 687–697 (electronic).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Losert, V. and Rindler, H.. Almost invariant sets. Bull. London Math. Soc. 13(2) (1981), 145–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Lind, D., Schmidt, K. and Ward, T.. Mahler measure and entropy for commuting automorphisms of compact groups. Invent. Math. 101 (1990), 593–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Lind, D. and Ward, T.. Automorphisms of solenoids and p-adic entropy. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 8 (1988), 411–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Royden, H. L.. Real Analysis, 3rd edn. Macmillan, New York, 1988.Google Scholar
[14]Schmidt, K.. Amenability, Kazhdan’s property (T), strong ergodicity and invariant means for ergodic group actions. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 1(2) (1981), 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Yuzvinskii, S. A.. Computing the entropy of a group endomorphism. Sib. Mat. Z. 8 (1967), 230–239; Sib. Math. J. 8 (1968) 172–178 (Engl. transl.).Google Scholar