Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:47:17.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diffusion along transition chains of invariant tori and Aubry–Mather sets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2012

MARIAN GIDEA  and
CLARK ROBINSON
MARIAN GIDEA
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA Department of Mathematics, Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago, IL 60625, USA (email: [email protected])
CLARK ROBINSON
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA (email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We describe a topological mechanism for the existence of diffusing orbits in a dynamical system satisfying the following assumptions: (i) the phase space contains a normally hyperbolic invariant manifold diffeomorphic to a two-dimensional annulus; (ii) the restriction of the dynamics to the annulus is an area preserving monotone twist map; (iii) the annulus contains sequences of invariant one-dimensional tori that form transition chains (i.e., the unstable manifold of each torus has a topologically transverse intersection with the stable manifold of the next torus in the sequence); (iv) the transition chains of tori are interspersed with gaps created by resonances; (v) within each gap there is prescribed a finite collection of Aubry–Mather sets. Under these assumptions, there exist trajectories that follow the transition chains, cross over the gaps, and follow the Aubry–Mather sets within each gap, in any specified order. This mechanism is related to the Arnold diffusion problem in Hamiltonian systems. In particular, we prove the existence of diffusing trajectories in the large gap problem of Hamiltonian systems. The argument is topological and constructive.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 33 , Issue 5 , October 2013 , pp. 1401 - 1449
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Angenent, S. B.. Monotone recurrence relations, their Birkhoff orbits and topological entropy. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 10(1) (1990), 15–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Arnold, V. I.. Instability of dynamical systems with several degrees of freedom. Sov. Math. Dokl. 5(5) (1964), 581–585.Google Scholar
[3]Bernard, P.. The dynamics of pseudographs in convex Hamiltonian systems. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 21(3) (2008), 615–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Birkhoff, G. D.. Surface transformations and their dynamical applications. Acta Math. 43(1) (1922), 1–119.Google Scholar
[5]Birkhoff, G. D.. Sur quelques courbes fermées remarquables. Bull. Soc. Math. France 60 (1932), 1–26.Google Scholar
[6]Bounemoura, A. and Pennamen, E.. Instability for a priori unstable Hamiltonian systems. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. to appear.Google Scholar
[7]Burns, K. and Gidea, M.. Differential geometry and topology. With a View to Dynamical Systems (Studies in Advanced Mathematics). Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2005.Google Scholar
[8]Burns, K. and Weiss, H.. A geometric criterion for positive topological entropy. Comm. Math. Phys. 172(1) (1995), 95–118.Google Scholar
[9]Capiński, M. J.. Covering relations and the existence of topologically normally hyperbolic invariant sets. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 23(3) (2009), 705–725.Google Scholar
[10]Capiński, M. J. and Zgliczyński, P.. Transition tori in the planar restricted elliptic three body problem. Nonlinearity 24 (2011), 1395–1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Cheng, C.-Q. and Yan, J.. Existence of diffusion orbits in a priori unstable Hamiltonian systems. J. Differential Geom. 67(3) (2004), 457–517.Google Scholar
[12]Cheng, C.-Q. and Yan, J.. Arnold diffusion in Hamiltonian systems: a priori unstable case. J. Differential Geom. 82(2) (2009), 229–277.Google Scholar
[13]Chierchia, L. and Gallavotti, G.. Drift and diffusion in phase space. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Phys. Théor. 60(1) (1994), 144.Google Scholar
[14]Chirikov, B. V.. A universal instability of many-dimensional oscillator systems. Phys. Rep. 52(5) (1979), 264–379.Google Scholar
[15]Delshams, A., Gidea, M. and Roldan, P.. Arnold’s mechanism of diffusion in the spatial circular restricted three-body problem: a semi-numerical argument, 2010, arXiv:1204.1507.Google Scholar
[16]Delshams, A., Gidea, M. and Roldan, P.. Transition map and shadowing lemma for normally hyperbolic invariant manifolds. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. A, to appear.Google Scholar
[17]Delshams, A., Llave, R. de la and Seara, T. M.. A geometric approach to the existence of orbits with unbounded energy in generic periodic perturbations by a potential of generic geodesic flows of ${\bf T}^2$. Comm. Math. Phys. 209(2) (2000), 353–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Delshams, A., Llave, R. de la and Seara, T. M.. A geometric mechanism for diffusion in Hamiltonian systems overcoming the large gap problem: heuristics and rigorous verification on a model. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 179(844) (2006), viii+141.Google Scholar
[19]Delshams, A., Llave, R. de la and Seara, T. M.. Geometric properties of the scattering map of a normally hyperbolic invariant manifold. Adv. Math. 217(3) (2008), 1096–1153.Google Scholar
[20]Delshams, A., Gidea, M., Llave, R. de la and Seara, T. M.. Geometric approaches to the problem of instability in Hamiltonian systems. An informal presentation. Hamiltonian Dynamical Systems and Applications (NATO Science for Peace and Securety Series B Physics and Biophysics). Springer, Dordrecht, 2008, pp. 285–336.Google Scholar
[21]Galante, J. and Kaloshin, V.. Destruction of invariant curves in the restricted circular planar three-body problem by using comparison of action. Duke Math. J. 159(2) (2011), 275–327.Google Scholar
[22]Galante, J. and Kaloshin, V.. The method of spreading cumulative twist and its application to the restricted circular planar three body problem. Preprint, 2011.Google Scholar
[23]Gidea, M. and Llave, R. de la. Topological methods in the instability problem of Hamiltonian systems. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 14(2) (2006), 295–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Gidea, M. and Robinson, C.. Topologically crossing heteroclinic connections to invariant tori. J. Differential Equations 193(1) (2003), 49–74.Google Scholar
[25]Gidea, M. and Robinson, C.. Shadowing orbits for transition chains of invariant tori alternating with Birkhoff zones of instability. Nonlinearity 20(5) (2007), 1115–1143.Google Scholar
[26]Gidea, M. and Robinson, C.. Obstruction argument for transition chains of tori interspersed with gaps. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S 2(2) (2009), 393–416.Google Scholar
[27]Golé, C.. Symplectic Twist Maps: Global Variational Techniques (Advanced Series in Nonlinear Dynamics, 18). World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, 2001.Google Scholar
[28]Guzzo, M., Lega, E. and Froeschlé, C.. First numerical evidence of global Arnold diffusion in quasi-integrable systems. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 5(3) (2005), 687–698.Google Scholar
[29]Hall, G. R.. A topological version of a theorem of Mather on shadowing in monotone twist maps. Dynamical Systems and Ergodic Theory (Warsaw, 1986) (Banach Center Publications, 23). Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw, 1989, pp. 125–134.Google Scholar
[30]Hirsch, M. W., Pugh, C. C. and Shub, M.. Invariant Manifolds (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 583). Springer, Berlin, 1977.Google Scholar
[31]Hu, S.. A variational principle associated to positive tilt maps. Comm. Math. Phys. 191 (1998), 627–639.Google Scholar
[32]Jungreis, I.. A method for proving that monotone twist maps have no invariant circles. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 11(1) (1991), 79–84.Google Scholar
[33]Kaloshin, V.. Geometric proofs of Mather’s connecting and accelerating theorems. Topics in Dynamics and Ergodic Theory (London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 310). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003, pp. 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[34]Katok, A.. Some remarks on Birkhoff and Mather twist map theorems. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 2(2) (1982), 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[35]Katznelson, Y. and Ornstein, D. S.. Twist maps and Aubry–Mather sets. Lipa’s legacy (New York, 1995) (Contemporary Mathematics, 211). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1997, pp. 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[36]Laskar, J.. Frequency analysis for multi-dimensional systems. Global dynamics and diffusion. Phys. D 67(1–3) (1993), 257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[37]Le Calvez, P.. Propriétés dynamiques des régions d’instabilité. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Supér (4) 20(3) (1987), 443–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[38]Le Calvez, P.. Drift orbits for families of twist maps of the annulus. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 27(3) (2007), 869–879.Google Scholar
[39]Lichtenberg, A. J. and Lieberman, M. A.. Regular and Chaotic Dynamics (Applied Mathematical Sciences, 38), 2nd edn. Springer, New York, 1992.Google Scholar
[40]Lieberman, M. A. and Tennyson, J. L.. Chaotic motion along resonance layers in near-integrable Hamiltonian systems with three or more degrees of freedom. Long-time Prediction in Dynamics (Lakeway, TX, 1981) (Nonequilib. Problems Phys. Sci. Biol., 2). Wiley, New York, 1983, pp. 179–211.Google Scholar
[41]Lochak, P. and Marco, J.-P.. Diffusion times and stability exponents for nearly integrable analytic systems. Cent. Eur. J. Math. 3(3) (2005), 342–397 (electronic).Google Scholar
[42]Mandorino, V.. Connecting orbits for families of Tonelli Hamiltonians, 2011, arXiv:1107.4678.Google Scholar
[43]Marco, J.-P.. Modèles pour les applications fibrées et les polysystèmes. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 346(3–4) (2008), 203–208.Google Scholar
[44]Marco, J.-P.. A normally hyperbolic lambda lemma with applications to diffusion. Preprint, 2008.Google Scholar
[45]Mather, J. N.. More Denjoy minimal sets for area preserving diffeomorphisms. Comment. Math. Helv. 60(4) (1985), 508–557.Google Scholar
[46]Mather, J. N.. Variational construction of orbits of twist diffeomorphisms. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 4(2) (1991), 207–263.Google Scholar
[47]Mather, J. N.. Arnol’d diffusion. I. Announcement of results. Sovrem. Mat. Fundam. Napravl. 2 (2003), 116–130 (electronic).Google Scholar
[48]Moeckel, R.. Generic drift on Cantor sets of annuli. Celestial Mechanics (Evanston, IL, 1999) (Contemperary Mathematics, 292). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002, pp. 163–171.Google Scholar
[49]Pugh, C. and Shub, M.. Linearization of normally hyperbolic diffeomorphisms and flows. Invent. Math. 10 (1970), 187–198.Google Scholar
[50]Robinson, C.. Differentiable conjugacy near compact invariant manifolds. Bol. Soc. Bras. Mat. 2(1) (1971), 33–44.Google Scholar
[51]Treschev, D.. Trajectories in a neighbourhood of asymptotic surfaces of a priori unstable Hamiltonian systems. Nonlinearity 15(6) (2002), 2033–2052.Google Scholar
[52]Treschev, D.. Evolution of slow variables in a priori unstable Hamiltonian systems. Nonlinearity 17(5) (2004), 1803–1841.Google Scholar
[53]Xia, Z.. Arnol’d diffusion and instabilities in hamiltonian dynamics. Preprint, http://www.math.northwestern.edu/∼xia/preprint/arndiff.ps.Google Scholar
[54]Xia, Z.. Arnold diffusion: a variational construction. Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Vol. II (Berlin, 1998), Extra Vol. II. 1998, pp. 867–877 (electronic).Google Scholar
[55]Zgliczyński, P. and Gidea, M.. Covering relations for multidimensional dynamical systems. J. Differential Equations 202(1) (2004), 32–58.Google Scholar