Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:33:38.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differentiability with respect to parameters of average values in probabilistic contracting dynamical systems†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

W. Douglas Withers
W. Douglas Withers
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland 21402, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We consider a dynamical system consisting of a compact subset of RN or CN with several contracting maps chosen with prescribed probabilities, which may depend on position. We show that if the maps and the probabilities are Cl+α functions of the spatial variable and an external parameter, then the average value of a Cl+α function is a differentiate function of the parameter. One implication of this theorem is that for certain families of complex functions dependent on a parameter the reciprocal of the dimension of an invariant measure on the Julia set is a harmonic function of the parameter.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 1990 , pp. 599 - 610
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

References

REFERENCES

[1]Barnsley, M. & Demko, S.. Iterated function systems and the global construction of fractals. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A399 (1985), 243–275.Google Scholar
[2]Barnsley, M., Demko, S., Elton, J. & Geronimo, J.. Invariant measures for Markov processes arising from iterated function systems with place-dependent probabilities. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré 24 (3) (1988), 367–394.Google Scholar
[3]Barnsley, M. & Elton, J.. Stationary attractive measures for a class of Markov chains arising from function iteration. A new class of Markov processes for image encoding. Adv. in Appl. Probab. 20 (1988), 14–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Barnsley, M. & Harrington, A.. A Mandelbrot set for pairs of linear maps. Physica 15D (1985), 421–432.Google Scholar
[5]Brolin, H.. Invariant sets under iteration of rational functions. Ark. Mat. 6 (1965), 103–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Douady, A. & Hubbard, J.. Itération des polynômes quadratiques complexes. C.R. Acad. Sc. Paris, Sér. I 294 (1982), 123–126.Google Scholar
[7]Elton, J.. An ergodic theorem for iterated maps. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 7 (1987), 481–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Karlin, S.. Some random walks arising in learning models Pac. J. Math. 3 (1953), 752–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Manning, A.. The dimension of the maximal measure for a polynomial map. Ann. Math. 119 (1984), 425–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Ruelle, D.. Repellers for real analytic maps. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 2 (1982), 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Withers, W.. Calculation of Taylor series for Julia sets in powers of a parameter, in: Chaotic Dynamics and Fractals, pp. 203–213, Academic Press: New York, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Withers, W.. Calculating derivatives with respect to parameters in iterated function systems. Physica 28D (1987), 206–214.Google Scholar