Lemma 2.2 on p. 704 was quoted from the Ph.D. thesis of B. Praggastis [2, 1.4] incorrectly. The local isomorphism property ($=$ repetitivity) of a $\phi$-subdividing tiling does imply that the subdivision matrix $M$ is primitive (that is, $M^k>0$ for some $k\ge1$), however, the converse is false, in general. I am grateful to A. E. Robinson Jr. who showed me a counter-example.