Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:01:01.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A characterization of 3D steady Euler flows using commuting zero-flux homologies

Part of: Incompressible inviscid fluids Differential topology Equations of mathematical physics and other areas of application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2020

DANIEL PERALTA-SALAS Open the ORCID record for DANIEL PERALTA-SALAS [Opens in a new window] ,
ANA RECHTMAN  and
FRANCISCO TORRES DE LIZAUR
DANIEL PERALTA-SALAS
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencias Matemáticas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28049 Madrid, Spain email [email protected]
ANA RECHTMAN
Affiliation:
IRMA, Université de Strasbourg, 7 rue René Descartes, 67084 Strasbourg, France email [email protected]
FRANCISCO TORRES DE LIZAUR
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Mathematics, Vivatsgasse 7, 53111 Bonn, Germany email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We characterize, using commuting zero-flux homologies, those volume-preserving vector fields on a 3-manifold that are steady solutions of the Euler equations for some Riemannian metric. This result extends Sullivan’s homological characterization of geodesible flows in the volume-preserving case. As an application, we show that steady Euler flows cannot be constructed using plugs (as in Wilson’s or Kuperberg’s constructions). Analogous results in higher dimensions are also proved.

Keywords

smooth dynamicssymplectic dynamicsEuler equationsvolume-preserving flows

MSC classification

Primary: 57R30: Foliations; geometric theory 35Q31: Euler equations 76B99: None of the above, but in this section
Type
Original Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 41 , Issue 7 , July 2021 , pp. 2166 - 2181
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Arnold, V. I. and Khesin, B. A.. Topological Methods in Hydrodynamics. Springer, New York, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardona, R., Miranda, E. and Peralta-Salas, D.. Euler flows and singular geometric structures. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 377 (2019), 0034.Google Scholar
Cieliebak, K. and Volkov, E.. First steps in stable Hamiltonian topology. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 17 (2015), 321–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cieliebak, K. and Volkov, E.. A note on the stationary Euler equations of hydrodynamics. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 37 (2017), 454–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etnyre, J. and Ghrist, R.. Contact topology and hydrodynamics I. Nonlinearity 13 (2000), 441–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etnyre, J. and Ghrist, R.. Contact topology and hydrodynamics II. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 22 (2002), 819–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginzburg, V. and Khesin, B.. Steady fluid flows and symplectic geometry. J. Geom. Phys. 14 (1994), 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izosimov, A. and Khesin, B.. Characterization of steady solutions to the 2D Euler equation. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2017 (2017), 7459–7503.Google Scholar
Kuperberg, G.. A volume-preserving counterexample to the Seifert conjecture. Comment. Math. Helv. 71 (1996), 70–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, F.. Geometric Measure Theory. Academic Press, Boston, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peralta-Salas, D.. Selected topics on the topology of ideal fluid flows. Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 13 (2016), 1630012 (1–23).Google Scholar
Rechtman, A.. Use and disuse of plugs in foliations. PhD Thesis, ENS Lyon, 2009.Google Scholar
Rechtman, A.. Existence of periodic orbits for geodesible vector fields on closed 3-manifolds. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 30 (2010), 1817–1841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, B.. Convexity: An Analytic Viewpoint. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, D.. Cycles for the dynamical study of foliated manifolds and complex manifolds. Invent. Math. 36 (1976), 225–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, D.. A foliation of geodesics is characterized by having no tangent homologies. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 13 (1978), 101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tao, T.. On the universality of potential well dynamics. Dyn. PDE 14 (2017), 219–238.Google Scholar
Tischler, D.. On fibering certain foliated manifolds over 𝕊1 . Topology 9 (1970), 153–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, F. W.. On the minimal sets of non-singular vector fields. Ann. of Math. (2) 84 (1966), 529–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar