Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:41:47.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An invariant for rigid rank-1 transformations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Nathaniel Friedman
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, SUNY at Albany, Albany, NY 12222, USA
Patrick Gabriel
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Probabilités, Université de Dijon, Dijon, France
Jonathan King
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Associated to a rigid rank-1 transformation T is a semigroup ℒ(T) of natural numbers, closed under factors. If ℒ(S) ≠ ℒ(T) then S and T cannot be copied isomorphically onto the same space so that they commute. If ℒ(S) ⊅ ℒ(T) then S cannot be a factor of T. For each semigroup L we construct a weak mixing S such that ℒ(S) = L. The S where ℒ(S) = {l}, despite having uncountable commutant, has no roots.

Preceding and preparing for this example are two others: An uncountable abelian group G of weak mixing transformations for which any two (non-identity) members have identical self-joinings of all orders and powers. The second example, to contrast with the rank-1 property that the weak essential commutant must be the trivial group, is of a rank-2 transformation with uncountable weak essential commutant.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

References

REFERENCES

[1]Junco, A. del & Rudolph, D.. A rank one, rigid, prime, simple map. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 1 (1987), 229247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Junco, A. del & Rudolph, D.. On ergodic actions whose self-joinings are graphs. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 7 (1987), 531557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]King, J. L.. The commutant is the weak closure of the powers, for rank-1 transformations. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 6 (1986), 363384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]King, J. L.. Joining-rank and the structure of finite rank mixing transformations. Journal d'Analyse.Google Scholar