Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:48:50.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The absorption theorem for affable equivalence relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

THIERRY GIORDANO
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Ottawa, 585 King Edward, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 6N5
HIROKI MATUI
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Science, Chiba University, 1-33 Yayoi-cho, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8522, Japan
IAN F. PUTNAM
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C., Canada V8W 3P4
CHRISTIAN F. SKAU
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), N-7034 Trondheim, Norway

Abstract

We prove a result about extension of a minimal AF-equivalence relation R on the Cantor set X, the extension being ‘small’ in the sense that we modify R on a thin closed subset Y of X. We show that the resulting extended equivalence relation S is orbit equivalent to the original R, and so, in particular, S is affable. Even in the simplest case—when Y is a finite set—this result is highly non-trivial. The result itself—called the absorption theorem—is a powerful and crucial tool for the study of the orbit structure of minimal ℤn-actions on the Cantor set, see Remark 4.8. The absorption theorem is a significant generalization of the main theorem proved in Giordano et al [Affable equivalence relations and orbit structure of Cantor dynamical systems. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys.24 (2004), 441–475] . However, we shall need a few key results from the above paper in order to prove the absorption theorem.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Giordano, T., Matui, H., Putnam, I. F. and Skau, C. F.. Orbit equivalence for Cantor minimalℤ2-systems. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 21 (2008), 863892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Giordano, T., Putnam, I. F. and Skau, C. F.. Topological orbit equivalence and C *-crossed products. J. Reine Angew. Math. 469 (1995), 51111.Google Scholar
[3]Giordano, T., Putnam, I. F. and Skau, C. F.. Affable equivalence relations and orbit structure of Cantor dynamical systems. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 24 (2004), 441475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Molberg, M.. AF-equivalence relations. Math. Scand. 99 (2006), 247256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Paterson, A. L. T.. Groupoids, Inverse Semigroups, and Their Operator Algebras (Progress in Mathematics, 170). Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar