Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:19:19.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When is a dynamical system mean sensitive?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2017

FELIPE GARCÍA-RAMOS ,
JIE LI  and
RUIFENG ZHANG
FELIPE GARCÍA-RAMOS
Affiliation:
Instituto de Fisica, Universidad Autonoma de San Luis Potosi, Manuel Nava 6, SLP, Mexico78290 email [email protected] Catedras CONACyT, Av. Insurgentes Sur 1582, Del. Benito Juárez, Mexico City, Mexico03940
JIE LI
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221116, PR China email [email protected] Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, PR China
RUIFENG ZHANG
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui, 230009, PR China email [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article is devoted to studying which conditions imply that a topological dynamical system is mean sensitive and which do not. Among other things, we show that every uniquely ergodic, mixing system with positive entropy is mean sensitive. On the other hand, we provide an example of a transitive system which is cofinitely sensitive or Devaney chaotic with positive entropy but fails to be mean sensitive. As applications of our theory and examples, we negatively answer an open question regarding equicontinuity/sensitivity dichotomies raised by Tu, we introduce and present results of locally mean equicontinuous systems and we show that mean sensitivity of the induced hyperspace does not imply that of the phase space.

Type
Original Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 39 , Issue 6 , June 2019 , pp. 1608 - 1636
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akin, E., Auslander, J. and Berg, K.. When is a transitive map chaotic? Convergence in Ergodic Theory and Probability (Columbus, OH, 1993) (Ohio State University Mathematics Research Institute Publications, 5) . de Gruyter, Berlin, 1996, pp. 25–40.Google Scholar
Akin, E. and Kolyada, S.. Li-Yorke sensitivity. Nonlinearity 16 (2003), 1421–1433.Google Scholar
Auslander, J. and Yorke, J.. Interval maps, factors of maps and chaos. Tôhoku Math. J. 32 (1980), 177–188.Google Scholar
Banks, J.. Chaos for induced hyperspace maps. Chaos Solitons Fractals 25 (2005), 681–685.Google Scholar
Bauer, W. and Sigmund, K.. Topological dynamics of transformations induced on the space of probability measures. Monatsh. Math. 79 (1975), 81–92.Google Scholar
Blanchard, F., Glasner, E., Kolyada, S. and Maass, A.. On Li-Yorke pairs. J. Reine Angew. Math. 547 (2002), 51–68.Google Scholar
Downarowicz, T. and Glasner, E.. Isomorphic extensions and applications. Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal. 48 (2015), 321–338.Google Scholar
Furstenberg, H.. Recurrence in Ergodic Theory and Combinatorial Number Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1981.Google Scholar
Fomin, S.. On dynamical systems with a purely point spectrum. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 77 (1951), 29–32.Google Scholar
García-Ramos, F.. Weak forms of topological and measure theoretical equicontinuity: relationships with discrete spectrum and sequence entropy. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 37(4) (2017), 1211–1237.Google Scholar
García-Ramos, F. and Marcus, B.. Mean sensitive, mean equicontinuous and almost periodic functions for dynamical systems. Preprint, 2015, arXiv:1509.05246v3.Google Scholar
Glasner, E.. The structure of tame minimal dynamical systems. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 27 (2007), 1819–1837.Google Scholar
Glasner, E. and Weiss, B.. Sensitive dependence on initial conditions. Nonlinearity 6 (1993), 1067–1075.Google Scholar
Glasner, E. and Weiss, B.. Quasi-factors of zero-entropy systems. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 8 (1995), 665–686.Google Scholar
Glasner, E. and Weiss, B.. Locally equicontinuous dynamical systems. Colloq. Math. 84/85 (2000), 345–361.Google Scholar
Huang, W. and Ye, X.. An explicit scattering, non-weakly mixing example and weak disjointness. Nonlinearity 15 (2002), 825–846.Google Scholar
Huang, W. and Ye, X.. Devaney’s chaos or 2-scattering implies Li-Yorke’s chaos. Topology Appl. 117 (2002), 259–272.Google Scholar
Huang, W. and Ye, X.. A local variational relation and applications. Israel J. Math. 151 (2006), 237–279.Google Scholar
Iwanik, A.. Independence and scrambled sets for chaotic mappings. The Mathematical Heritage of C. F. Gauss. World Scientific Publishing, River Edge, NJ, 1991, pp. 372–378.Google Scholar
Kerr, D. and Li, H.. Independence in topological and C ∗ -dynamics. Math. Ann. 338 (2007), 869–926.Google Scholar
Kwietniak, D. and Oprocha, P.. Topological entropy and chaos for maps induced on hyperspaces. Chaos Solitons Fractals 33 (2007), 76–86.Google Scholar
Li, J., Li, J. and Tu, S.. Devaney chaos plus shadowing implies distributional chaos. Chao 26 (2016),093103.Google Scholar
Li, J., Oprocha, P. and Wu, X.. Furstenberg families, sensitivity and the space of probability measures. Nonlinearity 30 (2017), 987–1005.Google Scholar
Li, J., Oprocha, P., Ye, X. and Zhang, R.. When are all closed subsets recurrent? Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 37(7) (2017), 2223–2254.Google Scholar
Li, J., Tu, S. and Ye, X.. Mean equicontinuity and mean sensitivity. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 35 (2015), 2587–2612.Google Scholar
Li, J., Yan, K. and Ye, X.. Recurrence properties and disjointness on the induced spaces. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 35 (2015), 1059–1073.Google Scholar
Moothathu, T.. Stronger forms of sensitivity for dynamical systems. Nonlinearity 20 (2007), 2115–2126.Google Scholar
Moothathu, T.. Implications of pseudo-orbit tracing property for continuous maps on compacta. Topology Appl. 158 (2011), 2232–2239.Google Scholar
Nadler, S.. Continuum Theory. An Introduction (Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 158) . Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1992.Google Scholar
Ruelle, D.. Dynamical systems with turbulent behavior. Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics (Proc. Int. Conf., University of Rome, Rome, 1977) (Lecture Notes in Physics, 80) . Eds. Dell’Antonio, G., Doplicher, S. and Jona-Lasinio, G.. Springer, Berlin, 1978, pp. 341–360.Google Scholar
Tan, F. and Zhang, R.. On F-sensitive pairs. Acta Math. Sci. Ser. B Engl. Ed. 31 (2011), 1425–1435.Google Scholar
Tu, S.. Some notions of topological dynamics in the mean sense, nilsystem and generalised polynomial. PhD Thesis, School of Mathematics, University of Science and Technology of China, May 2014.Google Scholar
Walters, P.. An Introduction to Ergodic Theory (Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 79) . Springer, New York, 1982.Google Scholar
Wu, X., Wang, J. and Chen, G.. F-sensitivity and multi-sensitivity of hyperspatial dynamical systems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 429 (2015), 16–26.Google Scholar
Ye, X. and Zhang, R.. On sensitive sets in topological dynamics. Nonlinearity 21 (2008), 1601–1620.Google Scholar