Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:06:00.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The topology of attractors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2010

Judy A. Kennedy
Judy A. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, De 19716, USA, (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We prove for a large class of compact metric spaces, including those manifolds of dimension at least two, Hilbert cube manifolds, and homogeneous Menger manifolds, that ‘most’ self-homeomorphisms (in the sense of residual set of homeomorphisms) have certain properties. Specifically, if F: X → X is one of these homeomorphisms, then F admits

• a dense, open wandering set;

• a nowhere dense chain recurrent set;

• an infinite collection of attractors (and repellers), each of which has nonempty interior and cannot be reduced to a ‘smallest’ attractor (or ‘largest’ repeller); and an uncountable collection of pairwise disjoint quasi-attractors.

We also discuss the topology of the boundaries of attractors.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 16 , Issue 6 , December 1996 , pp. 1311 - 1322
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[AHK] Akin, E., Hurley, M. and Kennedy, J.. The generic homeomorphism is complicated, but not chaotic. SubmittedGoogle Scholar
[Be] Bestvina, M.. Characterizing k-dimensional universal Menger continua. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. (380) 71 (1988), 1.Google Scholar
[B] Bing, R. H.. Concerning hereditarily indecomposable continua. Pacific J. Math. 1 (1951), 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[HI] Hurley, M., Generic homeomorphisms have no smallest attractors. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 123 (1995), 1227–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[H2] Hurley, M., Properties of attractors of generic homeomorphisms. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. pp 1297–1310 of this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar