Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:52:21.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Properties of attractors of generic homeomorphisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2010

Mike Hurley
Mike Hurley
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106-7058, USA, (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We describe several generic properties of homeomorphisms on compact manifolds. These properties concern the attractors of a homeomorphism, its chain recurrent set, and the periodic points.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 16 , Issue 6 , December 1996 , pp. 1297 - 1310
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Conley, C.. Isolated Invariant Sets and the Morse Index. C.B.M.S. publication #38, A.M.S., Providence, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Coven, E. M., Madden, J. and Nitecki, Z.. A note on generic properties of continuous maps. Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems II. Birkhäuser, Boston, 1982, pp. 97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Dobrynskii, V. A.. Dynamical systems with stable prolongation are typical. Dynamical Systems and Questions of Stability for Differential Equations. Kiev, 1973, pp. 43–53. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
[4] Franks, J.. A variation of the Poincaré-Birkhoff theorem. Hamiltonian Dynamical Systems (Contemp. Math. vol. 81) A.M.S., Providence, 1988, pp. 111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Hurley, M.. Noncompact chain recurrence and attraction. Proc. A.M.S. 115 (1992), 1139–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Hurley, M.. Generic homeomorphisms have no smallest attractors. Proc. A.M.S. 123 (1995), 1277–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Hurley, M.. On proofs of the C0 general density theorem. Proc. A.M.S. 124 (1996), 1305–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Kennedy, J.. The topology of attractors. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. pp. 1311–1322 of this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Munkres, J.. Obstructions to the smoothing of piecewise-differentiable homeomorphisms. Ann. Math. 72 (1960), 521–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Nitecki, Z. and Shub, M.. Filiations, decompositions, and explosions. Amer. J. Math. 97 (1976), 1029–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Palis, J., Pugh, C., Shub, M. and Sullivan, D.. Genericity theorems in topological dynamics. Dynamical Systems—Warwick 1974 (Lecture Notes in Mathematics 468), Springer, New York, 1975, pp. 241–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Shub, M.. Structurally stable diffeomorphisms are dense. Bull. A.M.S. 78 (1972), 817–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Takens, F.. On Zeeman's tolerance stability conjecture. Manifolds—Amsterdam 1970 (Lecture Notes in Mathematics 197). Springer, New York, 1970, pp. 209–219.Google Scholar
[14] Walters, P.. On the pseudo-orbit tracing property and its relationship to stability. The Structure of Attractors in Dynamical Systems (Lecture Notes in Mathematics 668). Springer, New York, 1978, pp. 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar