Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:52:36.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On a class of stable conditional measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2010

EUGEN MIHAILESCU*
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, ‘Simion Stoilow’ of the Romanian Academy, PO Box 1-764, RO-014700, Bucharest, Romania (email: [email protected])

Abstract

The dynamics of endomorphisms (smooth non-invertible maps) presents many differences from that of diffeomorphisms or that of expanding maps; most methods from those cases do not work if the map has a basic set of saddle type with self-intersections. In this paper we study the conditional measures of a certain class of equilibrium measures, corresponding to a measurable partition subordinated to local stable manifolds. We show that these conditional measures are geometric probabilities on the local stable manifolds, thus answering in particular the questions related to the stable pointwise Hausdorff and box dimensions. These stable conditional measures are shown to be absolutely continuous if and only if the respective basic set is a non-invertible repeller. We find also invariant measures of maximal stable dimension, on folded basic sets. Examples are given, too, for such non-reversible systems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Barreira, L.. Dimension and Recurrence in Hyperbolic Dynamics. Birkhäuser, Basel, Boston, Berlin, 2008.Google Scholar
[2]Barreira, L. and Wolf, C.. Measures of maximal dimension for hyperbolic diffeomorphisms. Comm. Math. Phys. 239 (2003), 93113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Bothe, H. G.. Shift spaces and attractors in noninvertible horseshoes. Fund. Math. 152(3) (1997), 267289.Google Scholar
[4]Bowen, R.. Equilibrium States and the Ergodic Theory of Anosov Diffeomorphisms (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 470). Springer, Berlin, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Eckmann, J. P. and Ruelle, D.. Ergodic theory of chaos. Rev. Mod. Phys. 57(3) (1985), 617656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Federer, H.. Geometric Measure Theory. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Hasselblatt, B. and Katok, A.. Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems. Cambridge University Press, London, New York, 1995.Google Scholar
[8]Ledrappier, F. and Young, L. S.. The metric entropy of diffeomorphisms I. Characterization of measures satisfying Pesin’s entropy formula. Ann. of Math. (2) 122 (1985), 509539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Liu, P. D.. Invariant measures satisfying an equality relating entropy, folding entropy and negative Lyapunov exponents. Comm. Math. Phys. 284(2) (2008), 391406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Mattila, P.. Geometry of sets and measures in Euclidean spaces. Fractals and Rectifiability (Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 44). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.Google Scholar
[11]Mihailescu, E.. Unstable manifolds and Holder structures associated to noninvertible maps. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 14(3) (2006), 419446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Mihailescu, E.. Metric properties of some fractal sets and applications of inverse pressure. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 148(3) (2010), 553572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Mihailescu, E. and Urbański, M.. Inverse pressure estimates and the independence of stable dimension for non-invertible maps. Canad. J. Math. 60(3) (2008), 658684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Mihailescu, E. and Urbański, M.. Transversal families for hyperbolic skew products. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 21(3) (2008), 907928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Parry, W. and Walters, P.. Endomorphisms of a Lebesgue space. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 78 (1972), 272276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Pesin, Y.. Dimension Theory in Dynamical Systems. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Rokhlin, V. A.. Lectures on the theory of entropy of transformations with invariant measures. Russian Math. Surveys 22 (1967), 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Ruelle, D.. The thermodynamical formalism for expanding maps. Comm. Math. Phys. 125 (1989), 239262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Ruelle, D.. Elements of Differentiable Dynamics and Bifurcation Theory. Academic Press, New York, 1989.Google Scholar