Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:06:43.453Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Morse–Bott inequalities via a dynamical systems approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2009

AUGUSTIN BANYAGA  and
DAVID E. HURTUBISE
AUGUSTIN BANYAGA
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA (email: [email protected])
DAVID E. HURTUBISE
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Penn State Altoona, Altoona, PA 16601-3760, USA (email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Let f:M→ℝ be a Morse–Bott function on a compact smooth finite-dimensional manifold M. The polynomial Morse inequalities and an explicit perturbation of f defined using Morse functions fj on the critical submanifolds Cj of f show immediately that MBt(f)=Pt(M)+(1+t)R(t), where MBt(f) is the Morse–Bott polynomial of f and Pt(M) is the Poincaré polynomial of M. We prove that R(t) is a polynomial with non-negative integer coefficients by showing that the number of gradient flow lines of the perturbation of f between two critical points p,q∈Cj of relative index one coincides with the number of gradient flow lines between p and q of the Morse function fj. This leads to a relationship between the kernels of the Morse–Smale–Witten boundary operators associated to the Morse functions fj and the perturbation of f. This method works when M and all the critical submanifolds are oriented or when ℤ2 coefficients are used.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 29 , Issue 6 , December 2009 , pp. 1693 - 1703
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Abbondandolo, A. and Majer, P.. Lectures on the Morse complex for infinite-dimensional manifolds. Morse Theoretic Methods in Nonlinear Analysis and in Symplectic Topology (NATO Science Series II: Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry, 217). Springer, Dordrecht, 2006, pp. 1–74.Google Scholar
[2]Austin, D. M. and Braam, P. J.. Morse–Bott theory and equivariant cohomology. The Floer Memorial Volume (Progress in Mathematics, 133). Birkhäuser, Basel, 1995, pp. 123–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Banyaga, A. and Hurtubise, D.. Lectures on Morse Homology (Kluwer Texts in the Mathematical Sciences, 29). Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Banyaga, A. and Hurtubise, D. E.. A proof of the Morse–Bott lemma. Expo. Math. 22 (2004), 365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Banyaga, A. and Hurtubise, D. E.. Morse–Bott homology, Preprint, arXiv:math.AT/0612316, 2006.Google Scholar
[6]Bismut, J.-M.. The Witten complex and the degenerate Morse inequalities. J. Differential Geom. 23 (1986), 207–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Bott, R.. Nondegenerate critical manifolds. Ann. of Math. (2) 60 (1954), 248–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Bott, R.. Lectures on Morse theory, old and new. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 7 (1982), 331–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Bott, R.. Morse theory indomitable. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 68 (1988), 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Helffer, B. and Sjöstrand, J.. A proof of the Bott inequalities. Algebraic Analysis, Vol. I. Academic Press, Boston, 1988, pp. 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Henniart, G.. Les inégalités de Morse (d’après E. Witten). Astérisque (1985), 43–61, Séminaire Bourbaki, Vol. 1983/84.Google Scholar
[12]Jiang, M.-Y.. Morse homology and degenerate Morse inequalities. Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal. 13 (1999), 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Schwarz, M.. Morse Homology. Birkhäuser, Basel, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Witten, E.. Supersymmetry and Morse theory. J. Differential Geom. 17 (1982), 661–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar