Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:00:39.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Homeomorphic restrictions of smooth endomorphisms of an interval

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Karen M. Brucks ,
Maria Victoria Otero-Espinar  and
Charles Tresser
Karen M. Brucks
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA
Maria Victoria Otero-Espinar
Affiliation:
Departamento de Analise Matematica, Facultade de Matematicas, Campus Universitario, s/n. 15771 Santiago de Compostea, Spain
Charles Tresser
Affiliation:
IBM, T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We describe the asymptotic dynamics of homeomorphisms obtained as restrictions of generic C2 endomorphisms of an interval with finitely many critical points, all of which are non-flat, and with all periodic points hyperbolic. The ω -limit set of such a restricted endomorphism cannot be infinite, except when the restriction of the endomorphism to the closure of the orbit of some critical point is a minimal homeomorphism of an infinite set.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 1992 , pp. 429 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Block, L. & Coven, E. M., ω-limit sets for maps of the interval. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 6 (1986), 335–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Collet, P. & Eckmann, J. -P.. Iterated Maps on the Interval as Dynamical Systems. Birkhauser: Boston, 1980.Google Scholar
[3]de Melo, W.. Lectures on One-dimensional Dynamics. 17th Colóquio Brasileiro de Matemática, 1989.Google Scholar
[4]Gottschalk, W. H. & Hedlund, G. A.. Topological Dynamics. Amer. Math. Soc. Coll. Pub., vol. 36, 1955.Google Scholar
[5]Guckenheimer, J.. Sensitive dependence on initial conditions for one-dimensional maps. Commun. Math. Phys. 70 (1979), 133–160.Google Scholar
[6]Mañé, R.. Hyperbolicity, sinks, and measure in one dimensional dynamics. Commun. Math. Phys. 100 (1985), 495–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and Erratum. Commun. Math. Phys. 112 (1987), 721–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Misiurewicz, M.. Absolutely continuous measures for certain maps of an interval. Publ. Math. IHES 53 (1980), 17–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Sarkovskîi, A. N.. On some properties of discrete dynamical systems. Sur la théorie de l'itération et ses applications. Coll Int. CNRS 332 (1982), Toulouse.Google Scholar
[9]Sarkovskîi, A. N.. Attracting and attracted sets. Sou. Math. Dokl. 6 (1965), 268–270.Google Scholar
[10]Shub, M., Endomorphisms of compact differentiable manifolds. Amer. J. Math. 91 (1969), 175–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Singer, D.. Stable orbits and bifurcations of maps of the interval. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 35 (1978), 260.Google Scholar
[12]Walters, P.. An Introduction to Ergodic Theory. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1982.Google Scholar