Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T02:16:07.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The existence of measures of a given cocycle, II: probability measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

BENJAMIN MILLER
BENJAMIN MILLER*
Affiliation:
UCLA Department of Mathematics, 520 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1555, USA (email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Given a Polish space X, a countable Borel equivalence relation E on X, and a Borel cocycle , we characterize the circumstances under which there is a probability measure μ on X such that ρ(ϕ−1(x),x)=[d(ϕ*μ)/dμ](x) μ-almost everywhere, for every Borel injection ϕ whose graph is contained in E.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 28 , Issue 5 , October 2008 , pp. 1615 - 1633
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Ditzen, A.. Definable equivalence relations on Polish spaces. PhD Thesis, California Institute of Technology, 1992.Google Scholar
[2]Feldman, J. and Moore, C. C.. Ergodic equivalence relations, cohomology, and von Neumann algebras. I. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 234(2) (1977), 289–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Halmos, P.. Measure Theory. Van Nostrand, New York, 1950.Google Scholar
[4]Kechris, A. S.. Classical Descriptive Set Theory (Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 156). Springer, New York, 1995.Google Scholar
[5]Miller, B. D.. The existence of measures of a given cocycle, I: atomless, ergodic σ-finite measures. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 28(5) (2008), 1599–1613.Google Scholar
[6]Nadkarni, M.. On the existence of a finite invariant measure. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci. 100(3) (1990), 203–220.Google Scholar
[7]Petersen, K.. Ergodic Theory (Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 2). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar