Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:28:14.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Equilibrium states for partially hyperbolic horseshoes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

R. LEPLAIDEUR ,
K. OLIVEIRA  and
I. RIOS
R. LEPLAIDEUR
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Mathématiques, UMR 6205, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, 6 rue Victor le Gorgeu, BP 809, F-29285 Brest, Cedex, France (email: [email protected])
K. OLIVEIRA
Affiliation:
Departamento de Matemática, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Maceió, 57072-090, Brazil (email: [email protected])
I. RIOS
Affiliation:
Instituto de Mathemática, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rua Mário Santos Braga s/n, Niterói, RJ, 24.020-140, Brazil (email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study ergodic properties of invariant measures for the partially hyperbolic horseshoes, introduced in Díaz et al [Destroying horseshoes via heterodimensional cycles: generating bifurcations inside homoclinic classes. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 29 (2009), 433–474]. These maps have a one-dimensional center direction Ec, and are at the boundary of the (uniformly) hyperbolic diffeomorphisms (they are constructed bifurcating hyperbolic horseshoes via heterodimensional cycles). We prove that every ergodic measure is hyperbolic, but the set of Lyapunov exponents in the central direction has gap: all ergodic invariant measures have negative exponent, with the exception of one ergodic measure with positive exponent. As a consequence, we obtain the existence of equilibrium states for any continuous potential. We also prove that there exists a phase transition for the smooth family of potentials given by ϕt=t log ∣DF∣Ec∣.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , February 2011 , pp. 179 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Abdenur, F., Bonatti, Ch., Crovisier, S., Díaz, L. J. and Wen, L.. Periodic points and homoclinic classes. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 27(1) (2007), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Baladi, V.. Positive Transfer Operators and Decay of Correlations (Advanced Series in Nonlinear Dynamics, 16). World Scientific, Singapore, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Bonatti, C., Díaz, L. J. and Viana, M.. Dynamics Beyond Uniform Hyperbolicity (Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, 102). Springer, Berlin, 2005. A global geometric and probabilistic perspective, Mathematical Physics, III.Google Scholar
[4]Bowen, R.. Equilibrium States and the Ergodic Theory of Anosov Diffeomorphisms (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 470). Springer, Berlin, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Bruin, H. and Keller, G.. Equilibrium states for S-unimodal maps. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 18 (1998), 765–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Buzzi, J.. Thermodynamical formalism for piecewise invertible maps: absolutely continuous invariant measures as equilibrium states. Smooth Ergodic Theory and Its Applications (Seattle, WA, 1999) (Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, 69). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2001, pp. 749–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Buzzi, J. and Sarig, O.. Uniqueness of equilibrium measures for countable Markov shifts and multidimensional piecewise expanding maps. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 23 (2003), 1383–1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Díaz, L. J. and Gorodetski, A.. Non-hyperbolic ergodic measures for non-hyperbolic homoclinic classes. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 29(5) (2009), 1479–1513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Díaz, L. J., Horita, V., Sambarino, M. and Rios, I.. Destroying horseshoes via heterodimensional cycles: generating bifurcations inside homoclinic classes. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 29 (2009), 433–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Dunford, N. and Schwarz, J.. Linear Operators I: General Theory. Wiley, New York, 1957.Google Scholar
[11]Katok, A. and Hasselblatt, B.. Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Leplaideur, R. and Rios, I.. Invariant manifolds and equilibrium states for non-uniformly hyperbolic horseshoes. Nonlinearity 19 (2006), 2667–2694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Leplaideur, R. and Rios, I.. On the t-conformal measures and Hausdorff dimension for a family of non-uniformly hyperbolic horseshoes. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. to appear.Google Scholar
[14]Makarov, N. and Smirnov, S.. On thermodynamics of rational maps. II. Non-recurrent maps. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 67(2) (2003), 417–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Oliveira, K.. Equilibrium states for certain non-uniformly hyperbolic systems. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 23 (2003), 1891–1906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Oliveira, K. and Viana, M.. Thermodynamical formalism for robust classes of potentials and non-uniformly hyperbolic maps. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 28(2) (2008), 501–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Pesin, Ya. and Senti, S.. Thermodynamical formalism associated with inducing schemes for one-dimensional maps. Mosc. Math. J. 5 (2005), 743–744.Google Scholar
[18]Przytycki, F. and Rivera-Letelier, J.. Statistical properties of topological collet-eckmann maps. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 40 (2007), 135–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Przytycki, F. and Rivera-Letelier, J.. Nice inducing schemes and the thermodynamics of rational maps. Preprint, http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.4385, 2008.Google Scholar
[20]Ruelle, D.. Thermodynamic formalism. The Mathematical Structures of Classical Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics (Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 5). Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA, 1978.Google Scholar
[21]Sarig, O.. Phase transitions for countable topological markov shifts. Comm. Math. Phys. 217 (2001), 555–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Sarig, O.. Existence of Gibbs measures for countable Markov shifts. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 131 (2003), 1751–1758 (electronic).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Sinai, Ya.. Gibbs measures in ergodic theory. Russian Math. Surveys 27 (1972), 21–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Wang, Q. and Young, L.-S.. Strange attractors with one direction of instability. Comm. Math. Phys. 218 (2001), 1–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Yuri, M.. Thermodynamical formalism for countable to one Markov systems. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 335 (2003), 2949–2971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar