Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:18:25.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conjugacy, orbit equivalence and classification of measure-preserving group actions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

ASGER TÖRNQUIST
ASGER TÖRNQUIST*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto, 40 St. George Street, Room 6092, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We prove that if G is a countable discrete group with property (T) over an infinite subgroup H≤G which contains an infinite Abelian subgroup or is normal, then G has continuum-many orbit-inequivalent measure-preserving almost-everywhere-free ergodic actions on a standard Borel probability space. Further, we obtain that the measure-preserving almost-everywhere-free ergodic actions of such a G cannot be classified up to orbit equivalence by a reasonable assignment of countable structures as complete invariants. We also obtain a strengthening and a new proof of a non-classification result of Foreman and Weiss for conjugacy of measure-preserving ergodic almost-everywhere-free actions of discrete countable groups.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , June 2009 , pp. 1033 - 1049
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Becker, H. and Kechris, A.. The Descriptive Set Theory of Polish Group Actions (London Mathematical Society Lecture Notes, 232). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Bekka, B., de la Harpe, P. and Valette, A.. Kazhdan’s Property (T). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008.Google Scholar
[3]Connes, A., Feldman, J. and Weiss, B.. An amenable equivalence relation is generated by a single transformation. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 1 (1981), 431–450.Google Scholar
[4]Connes, A. and Weiss, B.. Property T and asymptotically invariant sequences. Israel J. Math. 37 (1980), 209–210.Google Scholar
[5]Dye, H. A.. On groups of measure preserving transformation. I. Amer. J. Math. 81 (1959), 119–159.Google Scholar
[6]Dye, H. A.. On groups of measure preserving transformation. II. Amer. J. Math. 85 (1963), 551–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Epstein, I.. Orbit inequivalent actions of non-amenable groups. Preprint arXiv:0707.4215v2.Google Scholar
[8]Foreman, M. and Weiss, B.. An anti-classification theorem for ergodic measure preserving transformations. J. Eur. Math. Soc. 6(3) (2004), 277–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Glasner, E.. Ergodic Theory via Joinings (Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 101). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Hjorth, G.. When it’s bad it’s worse. Note, 1997.Google Scholar
[11]Hjorth, G.. A converse to Dye’s theorem. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 357(8) (2005), 3083–3103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Hjorth, G.. Classification and Orbit Equivalence Relations (Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 75). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2000.Google Scholar
[13]Kechris, A.. Classical Descriptive Set Theory. Springer, New York, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Kechris, A.. Global aspects of ergodic group actions and equivalence relations. Caltech Preprint, 2006.Google Scholar
[15]Kechris, A. and Sofronidis, N. E.. A strong ergodicity property of unitary and self-adjoint operators. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 21 (2001), 1459–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Popa, S.. Some computations of 1-cohomology groups and construction of non-orbit-equivalent actions. J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 5(2) (2006), 309–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Schmidt, K.. Asymptotically invariant sequences and an action of SL(2,ℤ) on the sphere. Israel J. Math. 37 (1980), 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Törnquist, A.. Localized cohomology and some applications of Popa’s cocycle super-rigidity theorem. Preprint, arXiv:0711.0158v3, 2008.Google Scholar
[19]Zimmer, R.. Ergodic Theory and Semisimple Lie Groups. Birkhäuser, Basel, 1984.Google Scholar