Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:07:12.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What's the Point of “Knowledge” Anyway?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2012

Christoph Kelp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Knowledge and the State of Nature Edward Craig defends the thesis that the function of the concept of knowledge is to flag good informants. This paper aims to show that Craig's thesis (CT) is false. In order to establish this, I will point to some data that CT fails to explain in a satisfactory manner. I will then introduce an alternative thesis that is not only able to secure the acclaimed benefits of CT, but also provides a neat explanation of the recalcitrant data.

Type
Research Article
Information
Episteme , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , February 2011 , pp. 53 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cohen, S. 1999. “Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reasons.” Philosophical Perspectives 13: 57–89.Google Scholar
Craig, E. 1990. Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
DeRose, K. 1992. “Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52: 912–29.Google Scholar
Fricker, M. 2008. “Scepticism and the Genealogy of Knowledge.” Philosophical Papers 37: 27–50.Google Scholar
Greco, J. 2007. “The Purpose of Knowledge and the Nature of Ability.” Philosophical Issues 17: 57–69.Google Scholar
Greco, J. 2008. “What's Wrong with Contextualism?” The Philosophical Quarterly 58: 416–35.Google Scholar
Kusch, M. 2009. “Testimony and the Value of Knowledge.” In Haddock, A., Millar, A., and Pritchard, D. (eds.), Epistemic Value, pp. 60–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kvanvig, J. 2003. The Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. 1984. Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. 2009. Knowledge. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. 2010. “Anti-Luck Virtue Epistemology.” Manuscript.Google Scholar
Riggs, W. 2008. “The Value Turn in Epistemology.” In Hendricks, V. and Pritchard, D. (eds.), New Waves in Epistemology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar