Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:48:18.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WHAT IS TRANSMISSION*?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2016

John Greco
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Almost everyone agrees that knowledge can be transmitted via testimony, but only some think that transmission is a special phenomenon, and one that has been largely neglected in epistemology. Let's call this “special transmission,” or transmission*. This paper offers a positive proposal for characterizing transmission*, and then considers a radical theoretical option: that an adequate account of transmission* cannot be given in traditional epistemological categories. In that case, traditional epistemological theories are best conceived as explaining knowledge generation rather than knowledge transmission*.

Type
Articles
Information
Episteme , Volume 13 , Special Issue 4: 2015 Episteme Conference , December 2016 , pp. 481 - 498
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adler, J. 1996. ‘Transmitting Knowledge.’ Noûs, 30: 99–111.Google Scholar
Adler, J. 2015. ‘Epistemological Problems of Testimony.’ In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/testimony-episprob/.Google Scholar
Brown, J. 2010. ‘Knowledge and Assertion.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81: 549–66.Google Scholar
Coady, C. A. J. 1992. Testimony: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Faulkner, P. 2011. Knowledge on Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2007. Anti-Individualism: Mind and Language, Knowledge and Justification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2011. ‘The Division of Epistemic Labor.’ Episteme, 8: 112–25.Google Scholar
Graham, P. J. 2000. ‘Transferring Knowledge.’ Noûs, 34: 131–52.Google Scholar
Greco, J. 2010. Achieving Knowledge: A Virtue-theoretic Account of Epistemic Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greco, J. 2012a. ‘A (Different) Virtue Epistemology.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 85: 1–26.Google Scholar
Greco, J. 2012b. ‘Recent Work on Testimonial Knowledge.’ American Philosophical Quarterly, 49: 15–28.Google Scholar
Greco, J. 2013. ‘Knowledge, Testimony & Action.’ In Henning, T. and Schweikard, D. P. (eds), Knowledge, Virtue, and Action, pp. 15–29. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Greco, J. 2015. ‘Testimonial Knowledge and the Flow of Information.’ In Henderson, D. and Greco, J. (eds), Epistemic Evaluation, pp. 274–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardwig, J. 1985. ‘Epistemic Dependence.’ Journal of Philosophy, 82: 335–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardwig, J. 1991. ‘The Role of Trust in Knowledge.’ Journal of Philosophy, 88: 693–708.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, J. 2005. Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, D. 2009. ‘Motivated Contextualism.’ Philosophical Studies, 142: 119–31.Google Scholar
Hinchman, E. 2005. ‘Telling as Inviting to Trust.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 70: 562–87.Google Scholar
Kallestrup, J. and Pritchard, D. 2012. ‘Robust Virtue Epistemology and Epistemic Anti-Individualism.’ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 93: 84–103.Google Scholar
Lackey, J. 1999. ‘Testimonial Knowledge and Transmission.’ Philosophical Quarterly, 49: 471–90.Google Scholar
Lackey, J. 2006. ‘Introduction.’ In Lackey, J. and Sosa, E. (eds), The Epistemology of Testimony, pp. 1–24. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, J. 2007. ‘Norms of Assertion.’ Noûs, 41: 594–628.Google Scholar
Lackey, J. 2008. Learning from Words: Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McMyler, B. 2011. Testimony, Trust, and Authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, J. 2005. Knowledge and Practical Interests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Welbourne, M. 1979. ‘The Transmission of Knowledge.’ Philosophical Quarterly, 29: 1–9.Google Scholar
Welbourne, M. 1981. ‘The Community of Knowledge.’ Philosophical Quarterly, 31: 302–14.Google Scholar
Welbourne, M. 1986. The Community of Knowledge. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 2000. Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, S. 2015. ‘In Defence of Transmission.’ Episteme, 12: 13–28.Google Scholar