Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:04:43.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seeking the Truth and Taking Care for Common Goods–Plato on Expertise and Recognizing Experts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2012

Abstract

In this paper I discuss Plato's conception of expertise as a part of the Platonic theory of a good, successful life (eudaimonia). In various Platonic dialogues, Socrates argues that the good life requires a certain kind of knowledge that guides all our good, beneficial actions: the “knowledge of the good and bad”, which is to be acquired by “questioning ourselves and examining our and others’ beliefs”. This knowledge encompasses the particular knowledge of how to recognize experts in a given technical domain. The central element in Socrates’ account of an expert is what I call the truth-and-caring criterion: an expert has to make seeking the truth and avoiding (avoidable) error her supreme epistemic goal and she has to make caring for common goods the supreme goal of practising her expertise.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Benson, H. 2000. Socratic Wisdom: The Model of Knowledge in Plato's Early Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biondi Kahn, C. 2005. “Aristotle's Moral Expert: The Phronimos.” In Rasmussen, L. (ed.), Ethics Expertise: History, Contemporary Perspectives, and Applications, pp. 3953. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Brickhouse, T. C. and N, D. Smith. 2000. The Philosophy of Socrates. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. (ed.) 1997. Plato: Complete Works. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. 1999. “The Unity of Virtue.” Social Philosophy and Policy 15: 233–74.Google Scholar
Devereux, D. T. 1995. “Socrates' Kantian Conception of Virtue.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 33: 381401.Google Scholar
Gentzler, J. 1995. “How to Discriminate between Experts and Frauds: Some Problems for Socratic Peirastic.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 3: 227–46.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. I. 1999. Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. I. 2001. “Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63: 85110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, J. 2001. Platons Theorie des Wissens im “Theaitet”. Hypomnemata 128. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Hardy, J. 2005. “Wissen. Antike.” In Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, pp. 856–68. Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar
Hardy, J. 2006. “Die Welt im Fluβ? – Erkenntnistheorie und Ontologie im ersten Hauptteil des Theaitet.” Philosophiegeschichte und logische Analyse / Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 9: 3178.Google Scholar
Hardy, J. 2008. Jenseits der Täuschungen – Selbsterkenntnis und Selbstbestimmung mit Sokrates. Manuscript (Habilitation Free University of Berlin).Google Scholar
Hardy, J. 2010. “Virtue is Knowledge? Socratic Intellectualism Reconsidered.” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 1977. Plato's Moral Theory: The Early and the Middle Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 1995. Plato's Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. 1996. Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
LaBarge, S. 1997. “Socrates and the Recognition of Experts.” In McPherran, M. (ed.), Wisdom, Ignorance and Virtue: New Essays in Socratic Studies (supplementary volume of Apeiron), pp. 5162.Google Scholar
LaBarge, S. 2005. “Socrates and Moral Expertise.” In Rasmussen, L. (ed.), Ethics Expertise: History, Contemporary Perspectives, and Applications, pp. 538. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. 1999. “Socratic Intellectualism.” In Virtues of Authenticity: Essays on Plato and Socrates, pp. 2758. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Penner, T. 1992. “Socrates and the Early Dialogues.” In Kraut, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato, pp. 121–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Penner, T. 2005. “Socratic Ethics: Ultra-Realism, Determinism, and Ethical Truth.” In Gill, C. (ed.), Virtue, Norms, and Objectivity: Issues in Ancient and Modern Ethics, pp. 157–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reshotko, N. 2006. Socratic Virtue: Making the Best of the Neither-Good-Nor-Bad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roochnik, D. L. 1996. On Art and Wisdom: Plato's Understanding of Techne. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 2007. Plato and the Art of Philosophical Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, F. 1999. “Social Epistemology.” In Greco, J. & Sosa, E. (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, pp. 354–82. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Scholz, O. R. Forthcoming. “Experts –What They Are and How We Recognize Them.” In Schurz, G. and Werning, M. (eds.), Reliable Knowledge & Social Epistemology: The Philosophy of Alvin I. Goldman (supplementary volume of Grazer Philosophische Studien).Google Scholar
Williams, M. 2001. Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woodruff, P. 1990. “Plato's Early Theory of Knowledge.” In Everson, S. (ed.), Companions To Ancient Thought I: Epistemology, pp. 6094. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar