Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:46:28.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SECRECY AND CONSPIRACY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2017

Matthew R. X. Dentith  and
Martin Orr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the literature on conspiracy theories, the least contentious part of the academic discourse would appear to be what we mean by a “conspiracy”: a secretive plot between two or more people toward some end. Yet what, exactly, is the connection between something being a conspiracy and it being secret? Is it possible to conspire without also engaging in secretive behavior? To dissect the role of secrecy in conspiracies – and thus contribute to the larger debate on the epistemology of conspiracy theories – we define the concepts of “conspiracy,” “conspirator,” and “secret,” and argue that while conspirators might typically be thought to commit to keeping secrets once their conspiracy is underway, the idea that conspiracies are necessarily secretive to start with is not as obvious as previously thought.

Type
Articles
Information
Episteme , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , December 2018 , pp. 433 - 450
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aaronovitch, D. 2009. Voodoo Histories: The Role of the Conspiracy Theory in Shaping Modern History. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Ashley, Madison. 2015. ‘Terms and Conditions.’ Retrieved from http://www.ashleyrnadison.com/app/public/tandc.p?c=5.Google Scholar
Barkun, M. 2003. A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Basham, L. 2003. ‘Malevolent Global Conspiracy.’ Journal of Social Philosophy, 34: 91–103.Google Scholar
Basham, L. 2011. ‘Conspiracy Theory and Rationality.’ In Jensen, C. and Harré, R. (eds), Beyond Rationality, pp. 49–87. Newcastle on Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Basham, L. Forthcoming. ‘Joining the Conspiracy.’ In Uscinski, J. (ed.), Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blaauw, M. 2013a. ‘Introduction: Privacy, Secrecy and Epistemology.’ Episteme, 10: 99.Google Scholar
Blaauw, M. 2013b. ‘The Epistemic Account of Privacy.’ Episteme, 10: 167–77.Google Scholar
Bok, S. 1982. Secrets: On the Ethics of Concealment and Revelation. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Boothroyd, D. 2011. ‘Off the Record: Levinas, Derrida and the Secret of Responsibility.’ Theory, Culture and Society, 28: 41–59.Google Scholar
Bratich, J. Z. 2008. Conspiracy Panics: Political Rationality and Popular Culture. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Coady, D. 2012. What To Believe Now: Applying Epistemology to Contemporary Issues. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
de Ridder, J. 2013. ‘Is there Epistemic Justification for Secrecy in Science?’ Episteme, 10: 101–16.Google Scholar
Dentith, M. R. X. 2014. The Philosophy of Conspiracy Theories. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dentith, M. R. X. 2016. ‘When Inferring to a Conspiracy Theory Might be the Best Explanation.’ Social Epistemology. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2016.1172362.Google Scholar
Grimes, D. R. 2016. ‘On the Viability of Conspiratorial Beliefs.’ PLoS ONE, 11: e0147905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147905.Google Scholar
Husting, G. and Orr, M. 2007. ‘Dangerous Machinery: ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ as a Transpersonal Strategy of Exclusion.’ Symbolic Interaction, 30: 127–50.Google Scholar
Keeley, B. L. 1999. ‘Of Conspiracy Theories.’ Journal of Philosophy, 96: 109–26.Google Scholar
Keeley, B. L. 2007. ‘God as the Ultimate Conspiracy Theory.’ Episteme, 4: 135–49.Google Scholar
Knight, P. 2000. Conspiracy Culture: From the Kennedy Assassination to The X-Files. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lee, M. A. 1994. Acid Dreams: The Complete Social History of LSD: The CIA, the Sixties, and Beyond. New York, NY: Grove Press.Google Scholar
McMillan, S., Duska, R., Hamilton, R. and Casey, D. 2006. ‘The Ethical Dilemma of Research and Development Openness Versus Secrecy.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 65: 279–85.Google Scholar
Pelkmans, M. and Machold, R. 2011. ‘Conspiracy Theories and their Truth Trajectories.’ Focaal – Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 59: 66–80.Google Scholar
Pigden, C. 1995. ‘Popper Revisited, or What Is Wrong With Conspiracy Theories?’ Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 25: 3–34.Google Scholar
Pigden, C. Forthcoming. ‘Conspiracy Theories and the Conventional Wisdom Revisited.’ In Loukola, O. (ed.), Secrets and Conspiracies. Leiden: Rodopi Press.Google Scholar
Pipes, D. 1997. Conspiracy: How the Paranoid Style Flourishes and Where it Comes From. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. 1969. The Open Society and its Enemies, 5th edition. Vol. 2. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar