Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Peter, Fabienne
2009.
New Waves in Political Philosophy.
p.
143.
Danaher, John
2015.
Responsible Innovation 2.
p.
245.
Danaher, John
2016.
The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation.
Philosophy & Technology,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 3,
p.
245.
Min, John B.
2016.
Politics Must Get it Right Sometimes: Reply to Muirhead.
Critical Review,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
404.
Muirhead, Russell
2016.
The Epistemic Basis for Political Opposition: Rejoinder to Min.
Critical Review,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
412.
Grygieńć, Janusz
2016.
Dlaczego demokracja? Proceduralne, instrumentalne, epistemiczne i deliberacyjne teorie demokracji.
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Sociologica,
p.
5.
Liveriero, Federica
and
Santoro, Daniele
2017.
Proceduralism and the epistemic dilemma of Supreme Courts.
Social Epistemology,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 3,
p.
310.
Gledhill, James
2017.
The ideal and reality of epistemic proceduralism.
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 4,
p.
486.
Biale, Enrico
and
Liveriero, Federica
2017.
A multidimensional account of democratic legitimacy: how to make robust decisions in a non-idealized deliberative context.
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 5,
p.
580.
SCHWARTZBERG, MELISSA
2018.
Justifying the Jury: Reconciling Justice, Equality, and Democracy.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 112,
Issue. 3,
p.
446.
Gerlsbeck, Felix
2018.
What is democratic reliability? Epistemic theories of democracy and the problem of reasonable disagreement.
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 2,
p.
218.
Min, John B.
and
Wong, James K.
2018.
Epistemic approaches to deliberative democracy.
Philosophy Compass,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 6,
Danaher, John
2019.
The rise of the robots and the crisis of moral patiency.
AI & SOCIETY,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 1,
p.
129.
Danaher, John
2019.
Why Internal Moral Enhancement Might Be politically Better than External Moral Enhancement.
Neuroethics,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 1,
p.
39.
Dean, Rikki
Gagnon, Jean-Paul
and
Asenbaum, Hans
2019.
What Is Democratic Theory?.
Democratic Theory,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 2,
p.
v.
Lau, Pin Lean
2019.
Comparative Legal Frameworks for Pre-Implantation Embryonic Genetic Interventions.
p.
123.
Liveriero, Federica
2020.
Epistemic Injustice in the Political Domain: Powerless Citizens and Institutional Reform.
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 5,
p.
797.
Hannon, Michael
2020.
Empathetic Understanding and Deliberative Democracy.
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,
Vol. 101,
Issue. 3,
p.
591.
Klijnman, Carline
2021.
An Epistemic Case for Positive Voting Duties.
Critical Review,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 1,
p.
74.
2021.
Radical Proceduralism.
p.
173.