Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T12:24:17.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PEER DISAGREEMENT AND THE DUNNING-KRUGER EFFECT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2016

Eric Wiland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I argue that recent evidence about our self-serving biases has radical implications for the epistemology of peer disagreement. I conclude that much of the time when you are disagreeing with someone you regard as your epistemic peer, you should not merely move halfway to her judgment, as The Equal Weight View has it. That is not conciliatory enough. Surprisingly often, you should be at least weakly confident that you are wrong, and that your disputant is right.

Type
Articles
Information
Episteme , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 2017 , pp. 481 - 498
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, J. and Adams, P. 1961. ‘Realism of Confidence Judgments.’ Psychological Review, 68: 33–45.Google Scholar
Alicke, M., Klotz, M. L., Breitenbecher, D. L., Yurak, T. J. and Vredenburg, D. S. 1995. ‘Personal Contact, Individuation, and the Better-than-average Effect.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68: 804–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballantyne, N. 2015. ‘Debunking Biased Thinkers (Including Ourselves).’ Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 1: 141–62.Google Scholar
Brown, J. 1986. ‘Evaluations of Self and Others: Self-Enhancement Biases in Social Judgments.’ Social Cognition, 4: 353–76.Google Scholar
Burson, J., Larrick, R. and Klayman, J. 2006. ‘Skilled or Unskilled, but Still Unaware of it: How Perceptions of Difficulty Drive Miscalibration in Relative Comparisons.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90: 60–77.Google Scholar
College Board. 1976–1977. Student Descriptive Questionnaire. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Cross, P. 1977. ‘Not Can but Will College Teaching be Improved?’ New Directions for Higher Education, 17: 1–15.Google Scholar
DePaulo, B. M., Charlton, K., Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J. and Muhlenbruck, L. 1997. ‘The Accuracy-confidence Correlation in the Detection of Deception.’ Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1: 346–57.Google Scholar
Dunning, D. 2005. Self-insight: Roadblocks and Detours on the Path to Knowing Thyself. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J. and Kruger, J. 2003. ‘Why People Fail To Recognize Their Own Incompetence.’ Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12: 83–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, D., Heath, C. and Suls, J. M. 2004. ‘Flawed Self-Assessment: Implications for Health, Education, and the Workplace.’ Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5: 69–106.Google Scholar
Ehrlinger, J., Johnson, K., Banner, M., Dunning, D. and Kruger, J. 2008. ‘Why the Unskilled are Unaware? Further Explorations of (lack of) Self-insight among the Incompetent.’ Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105: 98–121.Google Scholar
Elga, A. 2007. ‘Reflection and Disagreement.’ Noûs, 41: 478–502.Google Scholar
Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedrich, J. 1996. ‘On Seeing Oneself as Less Self-serving than Others: The Ultimate Self-serving Bias?’ Teaching of Psychology, 23: 107–9.Google Scholar
Hansford, B. C. and Hattie, J. A. 1982. ‘The Relationship Between Self and Achievement/ Performance Measures.’ Review of Educational Research, 52: 123–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, K. 2012. ‘The Politics of Intellectual Self-Trust.’ Social Epistemology, 26: 237–51.Google Scholar
Kelly, T. 2005. ‘The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement.’ In Hawthorne, J. and Gendler-Szabo, T. (eds), Oxford Studies in Epistemology: Vol. I, pp. 167–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, T. 2008. ‘Disagreement, Dogmatism, and Belief Polarization.’ Journal of Philosophy, 105: 611–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, T. 2010. ‘Peer Disagreement and Higher Order Evidence.’ In Goldman, A. I. and Whitcomb, D. (eds), Social Epistemology: Essential Readings, pp. 183–217. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
King, N. L. 2012. ‘Disagreement: What's the Problem? or A Good Peer is Hard to Find.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 85: 249–72.Google Scholar
Kruger, J. M. and Dunning, D. 1999. ‘Unskilled and Unaware of it: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77: 1121–34.Google Scholar
Kvidera, S. and Koutstaal, W. 2008. ‘Confidence and Decision Type Under Matched Stimulus Conditions: Overconfidence in Perceptual but Not Conceptual Decisions.’ Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21: 253–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, J. and Christensen, D. (eds) 2013. The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mabe, P.A. III and West, S. G. 1982. ‘Validity of Self-evaluation of Ability: A Review and Meta-analysis.’ Journal of Applied Psychology, 67: 280–6.Google Scholar
McCormick, I., Walkey, F. and Green, D. 1986. ‘Comparative Perceptions of Driver Ability: A Confirmation and Expansion.’ Accident Analysis and Prevention, 18: 205–8.Google Scholar
Moore, M. and Fresco, D. 2012. ‘Depressive Realism: A Meta-analytic Review.’ Clinical Psychology Review, 32: 496–509.Google Scholar
Pronin, E., Lin, D. Y. and Ross, L. 2002. ‘The Bias Blind Spot: Perceptions of Bias in Self versus Others.’ Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28: 369–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutter, D. R., Quine, L. and Albery, I. P. 1998. ‘Perceptions of Risk in Motorcyclists: Unrealistic Optimism, Relative Realism and Predictions of Behaviour.’ British Journal of Psychology, 89: 681–96.Google Scholar
Worsnip, A. 2014. ‘Disagreement about Disagreement? What Disagreement about Disagreement?’ Philosophers' Imprint, 14: 1–20.Google Scholar