Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T23:36:33.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ontogenetic Foundations of Epistemic Norms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2020

Michael Tomasello
Michael Tomasello*
Affiliation:
Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, I approach epistemic norms from an ontogenetic point of view. I argue and present evidence that to understand epistemic norms – e.g., scientific norms of methodology and the evaluation of evidence – children must first develop through their social interactions with others three key concepts. First is the concept of belief, which provides the most basic distinction on which scientific investigations rest: the distinction between individual subjective perspectives and an objective reality. Second is the concept of reason, which in the context of science obligates practitioners to justify their claims to others with reasons by grounding them in beliefs that are universally shared within the community. Third is the concept of social norm, which is not primarily epistemic, but provides children with an understanding of norms as collective agreements. The theoretical argument is that all three of these concepts emerge not from just any kind of social interaction, but specifically from social interactions structured by the human species’ unique capacities for shared intentionality.

Keywords

epistemologynormsdevelopmentchildhoodshared intentionalitysocial epistemology
Type
Articles
Information
Episteme , Volume 17 , Special Issue 3: Epistemic Norms as Social Norms Conference , September 2020 , pp. 301 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brandom, R. (1994). Making it Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Csibra, G. and Gergely, G. (2011). ‘Natural Pedagogy as Evolutionary Adaptation.’ Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 366(1567), 1149–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darwall, S. (2006). The Second-Person Standpoint: Respect, Morality, and Accountability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, J. (2000). ‘Language and Theory of Mind: What are the Developmental Relationships?’ In Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H. and Cohen, D.J. (eds), Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Diesendruck, G., Carmel, N. and Markson, L. (2010). ‘Children's Sensitivity to the Conventionality of Sources.’ Child Development 81(2), 652–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diessel, H. and Tomasello, M. (2001). ‘The Acquisition of Finite Complement Clauses in English: A Corpus-based Analysis.’ Cognitive Linguistics 12(2), 97–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Göckeritz, S., Schmidt, M.F.H. and Tomasello, M. (2014). ‘Young Children's Creation and Transmission of Social Norms.’ Cognitive Development 30(April–June), 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardecker, S., Schmidt, M.F.H., Roden, M. and Tomasello, M. (2016). ‘Young Children's Behavioral and Emotional Responses to Different Social Norm Violations.’ Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 150, 364–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardecker, S., Schmidt, M. and Tomasello, M. (2017). ‘Children's Developing Understanding of the Conventionality of Rules.’ Cognition and Development 18(2), 163–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, D. (2020). ‘Are Epistemic Norms Fundamentally Social Norms?' Episteme. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2019.49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köymen, B. and Tomasello, M. (2018). ‘Children's Meta-talk in their Collaborative Decision-making with Peers.’ Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 166, 549–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Köymen, B., Lieven, E., Engemann, D.A., Rakoczy, H.Warneken, F. and Tomasello, M. (2014). ‘Children's Norm Enforcement in their Interactions with Peers.’ Child Development 85(3), 1108–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Köymen, B., Mammen, M. and Tomasello, M. (2016). ‘Preschoolers use Common Ground in their Justificatory Reasoning with Peers.’ Developmental Psychology 52(3), 423–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhn, D. (2015). ‘Thinking Together and Alone.’ Educational Researcher 44, 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebal, K., Carpenter, M. and Tomasello, M. (2013). ‘Young Children's Understanding of Cultural Common Ground.’ British Journal of Developmental Psychology 31(1), 88–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercier, H. and Sperber, D. (2011). ‘Why do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory.’ Behavioural and Brain Sciences 34(2), 57–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercier, H. and Sperber, D. (2017). The Enigma of Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mercier, H., Bernard, S. and Clément, F. (2014). ‘Early Sensitivity to Arguments: How Preschoolers Weight Circular Arguments.’ Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 125, 102–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moll, H. and Tomasello, M. (2007). ‘How 14- and 18-month-olds Know What Others Have Experienced.’ Developmental Psychology 43(2), 309–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Madagain, C. and Tomasello, M. (2019). ‘Joint Attention to Mental Content and the Social Origin of Reasoning.’ Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02327-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1932 [1965]). The Moral Judgment of the Child. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1965 [1995]). Sociological Studies. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rakoczy, H. and Tomasello, M. (2009). ‘Done Wrong or Said Wrong? Young Children Understand the Normative Directions of Fit of Different Speech Acts.’ Cognition 113, 205–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rakoczy, H., Warneken, F. and Tomasello, M. (2008). ‘The Sources of Normativity: Young Children's Awareness of the Normative Structure of Games.’ Developmental Psychology 44(3), 875–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rakoczy, H., Hamann, K., Warneken, F. and Tomasello, M. 2010. ‘Bigger Knows Better? Young Children Selectively Learn Rule Games from Adults rather than from Peers.’ British Journal of Developmental Psychology 28(4), 785–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riedl, K., Jensen, K., Call, J. and Tomasello, M. (2012). ‘No Third-party Punishment in Chimpanzees.’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 109, 14824–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riggs, A.E. and Young, A.G. (2016). ‘Developmental Changes in Children's Normative Reasoning Across Learning Contexts and Collaborative Roles.’ Developmental Psychology 52(8), 1236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, M. and Tomasello, M. (2012). ‘Young Children Enforce Social Norms.’ Current Directions in Psychological Science 21(4), 232–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, M., Svetlova, M., Johe, J. and Tomasello, M. (2016). ‘Children's Developing Understanding of Legitimate Reasons for Allocating Resources Unequally.’ Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 37, 42–52.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. (1963). Science, Perception, and Reality. New York, NY: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G. and Wilson, D. (2010). ‘Epistemic Vigilance.’ Mind and Language 25(4), 359–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M (2008). Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2014). A Natural History of Human Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2018). ‘How Children Come to Understand False Beliefs: A Shared Intentionality Account.’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. doi/10.1073/pnas.1804761115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M (2019) Becoming Human: A Theory of Ontogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toulmin, S.E. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vaish, A., Missana, M. and Tomasello, M. (2011). ‘Three-year-old Children Intervene in Third-party Moral Transgressions.’ British Journal of Developmental Psychology 29(1), 124–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaish, A., Carpenter, M. and Tomasello, M. (2016). ‘The Early Emergence of Guilt-Motivated Prosocial Behavior.’ Child Development 87, 1772–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed