Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:47:21.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IS TRUE BELIEF REALLY A FUNDAMENTAL EPISTEMIC VALUE?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2018

Lance K. Aschliman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, I question the orthodox position that true belief is a fundamental epistemic value. I begin by raising a particularly epistemic version of the so-called “value problem of knowledge” in order to set up the basic explanandum and to motivate some of the claims to follow. In the second section, I take aim at what I call “bottom-up approaches” to this value problem, views that attempt to explain the added epistemic value of knowledge in terms of its relation to a more fundamental value of true belief. The final section is a presentation of a value-theoretic alternative, one that explains the value problem presented in the first section while also doing justice to intuitions that may cause us to worry about bottom-up approaches. In short, knowledge and not mere true belief is a fundamental epistemic value as it is the constitutive goal of propositional inquiry.

Type
Articles
Information
Episteme , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , March 2020 , pp. 88 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahlstrom-Vij, K. and Grimm, S. 2013. ‘Getting it Right.’ Philosophical Studies, 166(2): 329–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, W. 2005. Beyond “Justification”: Dimensions of Epistemic Evaluation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Baehr, J. 2009. ‘Is There a Value Problem?’ In Haddock, A., Millar, A. and Pritchard, D. (eds), Epistemic Value, pp. 42–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrisman, M. 2012. ‘The Normative Evaluation of Belief and the Aspectual Classification of Belief and Knowledge Attributions.’ Journal of Philosophy, 109(10): 588–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, M. 2001. ‘Truth as the Epistemic Goal.’ In Steup, M. (ed.), Knowledge, Truth, and Duty: Essays on Epistemic Justification, Responsibility, and Virtue, pp. 151–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, M. 2014. ‘Truth as the Primary Epistemic Goal: A Working Hypothesis.’ In Steup, M., Turri, J. and Sosa, E. (eds), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, 2nd edition, pp. 363–77. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
DePaul, M. 2001. ‘Value Monism in Epistemology.’ In Steup, M. (ed.), Knowledge, Truth, and Duty: Essays on Epistemic Justification, Responsibility, and Virtue, pp. 170–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, H. 1998. ‘Identity and General Similarity.’ Philosophical Perspectives, 12: 177–99.Google Scholar
Gardiner, G. 2012. ‘Understanding, Integration, and Epistemic Value.’ Acta Analytica, 27(2): 163–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geach, P. 1956. ‘Good and Evil.’ Analysis, 17(2): 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gendler, T. S. 2002. ‘Personal Identity and Thought-Experiments.’ Philosophical Quarterly, 52(206): 34–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. 1999. Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. 2001. ‘The Unity of the Epistemic Virtues.’ In Fairweather, A. and Zagzebski, L. (eds), Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility, pp. 30–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. and Olsson, E. 2009. ‘Reliabilism and the Value of Knowledge.’ In Haddock, A., Millar, A. and Pritchard, D. (eds), Epistemic Value, pp. 19–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, J. 2010. Achieving Knowledge: A Virtue-Theoretic Account of Epistemic Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazlett, A. 2013. A Luxury of the Understanding: On the Value of True Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazlett, A. 2016. ‘What Does ‘Epistemic’ Mean?’ Episteme, 13(4): 539–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kappel, K. 2010. ‘On Saying that Someone Knows: Themes from Craig.’ In Haddock, A., Millar, A. and Pritchard, D. (eds), Social Epistemology, pp. 69–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelp, C. 2011. ‘What's the Point of ‘Knowledge’ Anyway?’ Episteme, 8: 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelp, C. 2017. ‘Knowledge First Virtue Epistemology.’ In Carter, A., Gordon, E. and Jarvis, B. (eds), Knowledge First: Approaches in Epistemology and Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornblith, H. 1985. Naturalizing Epistemology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kvanvig, J. 2003. The Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvanvig, J. 2014. ‘Truth is not the Primary Epistemic Goal.’ In Steup, M., Turri, J. and Sosa, E. (eds), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, 2nd edition. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Latus, A. 2000. ‘Our Epistemic Goal.’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 78(1): 28–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M. 2004. True to Life: Why Truth Matters. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M. 2009. ‘The Values of Truth and the Truth of Values.’ In A. Haddock, A. Millar and D. Pritchard (eds), Epistemic Value, pp. 225–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, A. 2010. ‘Knowledge and Recognition.’ In Haddock, A., Millar, A. and Pritchard, D. (eds), The Nature and Value of Knowledge: Three Investigations, pp. 91–187. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moser, P. 1985. Empirical Justification. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1961. The Collected Dialogues of Plato. Hamilton, E. and Cairns, H. (eds). Transl. Guthrie, W.K.C.. New York, NY: Bollingen Foundation.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. 2010. ‘Knowledge and Understanding.’ In Haddock, A., Millar, A. and Pritchard, D. (eds), The Nature and Value of Knowledge: Three Investigations, pp. 3–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. 2014. ‘Truth as the Fundamental Epistemic Good.’ In Matheson, J. and Vitz, R. (eds), The Ethics of Belief, pp. 112–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridge, M. 2013. ‘Getting Lost on the Road to Larissa.’ Noûs, 47(1): 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggs, W. 2008. ‘The Value Turn in Epistemology.’ In Hendricks, V. and Pritchard, D. (eds), New Waves in Epistemology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Siegel, H. 2005. ‘Truth, Thinking, Testimony and Trust: Alvin Goldman on Epistemology and Education.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 71(2): 345–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, E. 2007. A Virtue Epistemology: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, E. 2009. Reflective Knowledge: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylvan, K. Forthcoming. ‘Veritism Unswamped.’ Mind.Google Scholar
Treanor, N. 2014. ‘Trivial Truths and the Aim of Inquiry.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 89(3): 552–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, T. 2000. Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar