Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:56:25.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: The Epistemology of Mass Collaboration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2012

Don Fallis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Human beings regularly work together to get things done. In particular, people frequently collaborate on the production and dissemination of knowledge. For example, scientists often work together in teams to make new discoveries. How such collaborations produce knowledge, and how well they produce knowledge, are important questions for epistemology. In fact, several epistemologists (e.g., Hardwig 1991, Thagard 1997, Wray 2002) have addressed such questions regarding collaborative scientific research.

Type
Introduction
Information
Episteme , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , February 2009 , pp. 1 - 7
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arico, Adam, Ballantyne, Nathan, Bedke, Matt, Caton, Jacob, Evans, Ian, Fallis, Don, Fiala, Brian, Frické, Martin, Glick, David, Gross, Peter, Horgan, Terry, Ismael, Jenann, Pollock, John, Sanderman, Daniel, Thorn, Paul, and Vakarelov, Orlin. 2008. “An Objectivist Argument for Thirdism.” Analysis 68: 149–55.Google Scholar
Bishop, Michael A. and Trout, J. D.. 2005. Epistemology and the Psychology of Human Judgment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, Blaise, Shaw, Debora, and Barre, Kathryn La. 2003. “A Cast of Thousands: Coauthorship and Subauthorship Collaboration in the 20th Century as Manifested in the Scholarly Journal Literature of Psychology and Philosophy.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54: 855–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duguid, Paul. 2006. “Limits of Self-Organization: Peer Production and ‘Laws of Quality’.” First Monday. Retrieved November 1, 2008 from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_10/duguid/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Encyclopædia Britannica. 2006. “Fatally Flawed: Refuting the Recent Study on Encyclopedic Accuracy by the Journal Nature.” Retrieved November 1, 2008 from http://corporate.britannica.com/britannica_nature_response.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fallis, Don. 2006. “The Epistemic Costs and Benefits of Collaboration.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 44(supplement): 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallis, Don. 2008. “Toward an Epistemology of Wikipedia.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59: 1662–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallis, Don and Whitcomb, Dennis. Forthcoming. “Epistemic Values and Information Management.” The Information Society.Google Scholar
Fischman, Josh. 2008. “Encyclopædia Britannica Goes – Gasp! –Wiki.” Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved November 1, 2008 from http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/article/3064/encyclopedia-britannica-goes-gasp-wikiGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Simson L. 2008. “Wikipedia and the Meaning of Truth.” Technology Review. Retrieved November 1, 2008 from http://www.technologyreview.com/web/21558/Google Scholar
Giles, Jim. 2005. “Internet Encyclopaedias Go Head to Head.” Nature 438: 900–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldman, Alvin I. 1999. Knowledge in a Social World. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardwig, John. 1991. “The Role of Trust in Knowledge.” Journal of Philosophy 88: 693–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keen, Andrew. 2007. Cult of the Amateur: How Today's Internet Is Killing Our Culture. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Lackey, Jennifer. 2008. Learning From Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipton, Peter. 1998. “The Epistemology of Testimony.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 29: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHenry, Robert. 2004. “The Faith-Based Encyclopedia.” TCS Daily. Retrieved November 1, 2008 from http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=111504AGoogle Scholar
Page, Scott E. 2007. The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rainie, Lee and Tancer, Bill. 2007. “Data Memo.” PEW Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved November 1, 2008 from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Wikipedia07.pdfGoogle Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 2002. “The Dilemma of Ignorance: PGA Tour, Inc. v. Casey Martin.” Supreme Court Review 2001: 267–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seelye, Katharine Q. 2005. “A Little Sleuthing Unmasks Writer of Wikipedia Prank.” New York Times. Retrieved November 1, 2008 from http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/11/business/media/11web.htmlGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 2006. Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surowiecki, James. 2004. The Wisdom of Crowds. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Thagard, Paul. 1997. “Collaborative Knowledge.” Nous 31: 242–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viñas, Maria J. 2008. “Medical Wiki Backed by Prominent Colleges Will Go Live by Year's End.” Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved November 1, 2008 from http://chronicle.com/free/v55/i02/02a01702.htmGoogle Scholar
Wray, K. B. 2002. “The Epistemic Significance of Collaborative Research.” Philosophy of Science 69: 150–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar