Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Poston, Ted
2012.
Is There an ‘I’ in Epistemology?.
Dialectica,
Vol. 66,
Issue. 4,
p.
517.
Kusch, Martin
2013.
Annalisa Coliva on Wittgenstein and Epistemic Relativism.
Philosophia,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 1,
p.
37.
Hazlett, Allan
2014.
ENTITLEMENT AND MUTUALLY RECOGNIZED REASONABLE DISAGREEMENT.
Episteme,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Kusch, Martin
2016.
Relativism in Feyerabend's later writings.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A,
Vol. 57,
Issue. ,
p.
106.
Kopec, Matthew
and
Titelbaum, Michael G.
2016.
The Uniqueness Thesis.
Philosophy Compass,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 4,
p.
189.
Worsnip, Alex
2016.
Moral Reasons, Epistemic Reasons and Rationality.
The Philosophical Quarterly,
Vol. 66,
Issue. 263,
p.
341.
Silva, Paul
2017.
How Doxastic Justification Helps Us Solve the Puzzle of Misleading Higher‐Order Evidence.
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly,
Vol. 98,
Issue. S1,
p.
308.
Côté-Bouchard, Charles
and
Littlejohn, Clayton
2018.
Metaepistemology.
p.
147.
Worsnip, Alex
2018.
The Conflict of Evidence and Coherence.
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,
Vol. 96,
Issue. 1,
p.
3.
Alles, Nicolás
2019.
¿Qué concepción del conocimiento necesita la versión epistémica de la democracia deliberativa? Una propuesta de clasificación.
Ideas y Valores,
Vol. 68,
Issue. 171,
p.
161.
Jackson, Elizabeth
2021.
A Defense of Intrapersonal Belief Permissivism.
Episteme,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 2,
p.
313.
Callahan, Laura Frances
2021.
Epistemic Existentialism.
Episteme,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
539.
Silva Jr., Paul
2022.
Can Worsnip's strategy solve the puzzle of misleading higher-order apparent evidence?.
Inquiry,
Vol. 65,
Issue. 3,
p.
339.
Callahan, Laura Frances
2023.
Why are Epistemic Reasons Normative?.
Episteme,
p.
1.
Hamdo, Manhal
2023.
Epistemic Thought Experiments and Intuitions.
Vol. 150,
Issue. ,
p.
83.