Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:29:14.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CHILDREN AND TESTIMONIAL INJUSTICE: A RESPONSE TO BURROUGHS AND TOLLEFSEN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2018

Gary Bartlett Open the ORCID record for Gary Bartlett [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Michael Burroughs and Deborah Tollefsen (2016) claim that children are subject to widespread testimonial injustice. They argue that empirical data shows that children are prejudicially accorded less epistemic credibility in forensic contexts, and that this in turn shows that the same is true in broader contexts. While I agree that there is indeed testimonial injustice against children, I argue that Burroughs and Tollefsen exaggerate its severity and extent, by exaggerating children's testimonial reliability. Firstly, the empirical data do not quite support their claim about children's performance in forensic contexts. Secondly, while they advocate a relational conception of children's agency which emphasizes the role of adults in realizing their testimonial abilities, Burroughs and Tollefsen miss the full implications of such a conception for our evaluation of children's credibility, and for our behavior towards them in testimonial contexts. Thirdly, they underestimate the significance of children's limited general knowledge.

Type
Articles
Information
Episteme , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , June 2020 , pp. 178 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bluebond-Langner, M. 1978. The Private Worlds of Dying Children. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brainerd, C. J. 2013. ‘Developmental Reversals in False Memory: A New Look at the Reliability of Children's Evidence.’ Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22: 335–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. A. and Lamb, M. E. 2015. ‘Can Children Be Useful Witnesses? It Depends How They Are Questioned.’ Child Development Perspectives, 9: 250–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burroughs, M. D. and Tollefsen, D. 2016. ‘Learning to Listen: Epistemic Injustice and the Child.’ Episteme, 13: 359–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carel, H. and Györffy, G. 2014. ‘Seen But Not Heard: Children and Epistemic Injustice.’ The Lancet, 384: 1256–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ceci, S. J., Kulkovsky, S., Klemfuss, J. Z., Sweeney, C. D., and Bruck, M. 2007. ‘Unwarranted Assumptions about Children's Testimonial Accuracy.’ Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3: 311–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coles, R. 1986. The Moral Life of Children. New York, NY: Atlantic Monthly Press.Google Scholar
Coles, R. 2003. Children of Crisis. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Dotson, K. 2012. ‘A Cautionary Tale: On Limiting Epistemic Oppression.’ Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 33: 24–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, G. S. and Reed, R. S. 1986. ‘Age Differences in Eyewitness Testimony.’ Law and Human Behavior, 10: 317–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hand, M. 2015. ‘What Do Kids Know? A Response to Karin Murris.’ Studies in Philosophy and Education, 34: 327–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemfuss, J. Z. and Ceci, S. J. 2012. ‘Legal and Psychological Perspectives on Children's Competence to Testify in Court.’ Developmental Review, 32: 268–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotzee, B. 2017. ‘Education and Epistemic Injustice.’ In Kidd, I. J., Medina, J. and Pohlhaus, G. Jr. (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, pp. 324–35. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leippe, M. R. and Romanczyk, A. 1989. ‘Reactions to Child (Versus Adult) Eyewitnesses: The Influence of Jurors’ Preconceptions and Witness Behavior.’ Law and Human Behavior, 13: 103–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, J. A. 1986. ‘Age and Schematic Differences in the Reliability of Eyewitness Testimony.’ Developmental Psychology, 22: 50–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitra, I. 2010. ‘The Nature of Epistemic Injustice.’ Philosophical Books, 51: 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marin, B. V., Holmes, D. L., Guth, M., and Kovac, P. 1979. ‘The Potential of Children as Eyewitnesses: A Comparison of Children and Adults on Eyewitness Tasks.’ Law and Human Behavior, 3: 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEwan, I. 2001. Atonement. New York, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Melton, G. B. 1981. ‘Children's Competency to Testify.’ Law and Human Behavior, 5: 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murris, K. 2013. ‘The Epistemic Challenge of Hearing Child's Voice.’ Studies in Philosophy and Education, 32: 245–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. 2014. ‘Revised Investigative Interview Protocol: Version 2014.’ http://nichdprotocol.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/RevisedProtocolTMWH2final-1.pdf.Google Scholar
Oates, K. 2007. ‘Can We Believe What Children Tell Us?’ Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 43: 843–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pipe, M.-E., Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y. and Esplin, P. W. 2004. ‘Recent Research on Children's Testimony about Experienced and Witnessed Events.’ Developmental Review, 24: 440–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, D. A., Dickinson, J. J. and Brubacher, S. P. 2014. ‘Sources of Unreliable Testimony from Children.’ Roger Williams University Law Review, 19: 382–410.Google Scholar
Principe, G. F. and Schindewolf, E. 2012. ‘Natural Conversations as a Source of False Memories in Children: Implications for the Testimony of Young Witnesses.’ Developmental Review, 32: 205–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Principe, G. F., Kanaya, T., Ceci, S. J. and Singh, M. 2006. ‘Believing Is Seeing: How Rumors Can Engender False Memories in Preschoolers.’ Psychological Science, 17: 243–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, A. R. and Marsil, D. F. 2002. ‘Why Children's Suggestibility Remains a Serious Concern.’ Law and Contemporary Problems, 65: 127–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajac, R., Garry, M., London, K., Goodyear-Smith, F. and Hayne, H. 2013. ‘Misconceptions about Childhood Sexual Abuse and Child Witnesses: Implications for Psychological Experts in the Courtroom.’ Memory, 21: 608–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed