Article contents
ARROGANCE, TRUTH AND PUBLIC DISCOURSE
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 July 2018
Abstract
Democracies, Dewey and others have argued, are ideally spaces of reasons – they allow for an exchange of reasons both practical and epistemic by those willing to engage in that discourse. That requires that citizens have convictions they believe in, but it also requires that they be willing to listen to each other. This paper examines how a particular psychological attitude, “epistemic arrogance,” can undermine the achievement of these goals. The paper presents an analysis of this attitude and then examines four arguments for how its adoption – especially by the powerful – undermines the ideal of democracy as a space of reasons.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018
References
REFERENCES
- 11
- Cited by