Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:26:58.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Universal Intellectual Trust

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2012

Extract

All of us get opinions from other people. And not just a few. We acquire opinions from others extensively and do so from early childhood through virtually every day of the rest our lives. Sometimes we rely on others for relatively inconsequential information. Is it raining outside? Did the Yankees win today? But we also depend on others for important or even life preserving information. Where is the nearest hospital? Do people drive on the left or the right here? We acquire opinions from family and close acquaintances but also from strangers. We get directions from and heed the warnings of individuals we've never met, and likewise read books and articles and listen to television and radio reports authored by individuals we don't know personally. Moreover, we undertake inquiries in groups in which the group relies on the conclusions of the individuals making up the group. In some of these collective efforts everyone knows one another, for example, a set of neighbors taking a census of birds in the neighborhood. But others, such as the effort to understand gravity, are not so nearly self-contained. Indeed, many of the most impressive human intellectual accomplishments are the collective products of individuals far removed from another in location (and sometimes even over time) who rely on each other's conclusions without feeling the need to re-confirm them.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 A recent study of mitochondrial DNA suggests, for example, that all modern humans can be traced back to a breeding stock of no more than 10,000 individuals emerging from Africa within the last 100,000 years. See Nature, “A Start for Population Genomics,” December 7, 2000, p. 65; also, Natural History, “What's New in Prehistory,” May 2000, pp. 90 1.Google Scholar
2Davidson, Donald, “A Coherence Theory of Knowledge and Belief,” in LePore, E. (ed.), The Philosophy of Donald Davidson: Perspectives on Truth and Interpretation. London: Basil Blackwell, 1986, 307319.Google Scholar
3 An exception is Alvin Plantinga, Warrant and Proper Function, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
4Coady, C.A.J., Testimony. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
5Foley, Richard, Intellectual Trust in Oneself and Others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, Chapter 5 and Chapter 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Thanks to David Christensen, Hilary Kornblith, Harvey Siegel, Miriam Solomon, and Todd Stewart for their helpful comments.Google Scholar