Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T16:09:47.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rational Disagreement after Full Disclosure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2012

Michael Bergmann
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The question I consider is this:

The Question: Can two people–who are, and realize they are, intellectually virtuous to about the same degree–both be rational in continuing knowingly to disagree after full disclosure (by each to the other of all the relevant evidence they can think of) while at the same time thinking that the other may well be rational too?

I distinguish two kinds of rationality–internal and external–and argue in section 1 that, whichever kind we have in mind, the answer to The Question is ‘yes’ (though that positive answer is less wholehearted in the case of external rationality). Then, in section 2, I briefly make some more general remarks about when discovering a disagreement provides a defeater and when it doesn't. In the final section, I consider an important objection to the answer given in section 1 to The Question.

Type
Research Article
Information
Episteme , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , October 2009 , pp. 336 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bergmann, Michael. 2006. Justification without Awareness. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, Michael. Unpublished. “Externalist Justification and the Role of Appearances.”Google Scholar
Christensen, David. 2007. “Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News.” Philosophical Review 116: 187–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elga, Adam. 2007. “Reflection and Disagreement.” Noûs 41: 478–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Richard. 2006. “Epistemological Puzzles about Disagreement.” In Heatherington, S. (ed.), Epistemology Futures, pp. 216–36. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. 2000. Warranted Christian Belief. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolhurst, William. 1998. “Seemings.” American Philosophical Quarterly 35: 293–302.Google Scholar
White, Roger. 2005. “Epistemic Permissiveness.” Philosophical Perspectives 19: 445–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar